Table 3.
Prediction of the mean performance in two psychosocial OSCE stations (OSCE) by first impression (FIR) and MMI performance (MMI)
| R2 | P(F) | Beta | Sig. (beta) | First-order corr | Semi-partial corr | R2 change | Sig. (R2 change) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 First Impression only | .057 | .012* | ||||||
| FIR | .238 | .012* | .238 | |||||
| Model 2 MMI performance only | .065 | .007** | ||||||
| MMI | .255 | .007** * | .255 | |||||
| Model 3 FIR and MMI | .084 | .009** | ||||||
| FIR | .153 | .142 | .238 | .136 | .019 | .142 | ||
| MMI | .185 | .076 | .255 | .165 | .027 | .076 |
The predictors FIR and MMI are mean ratings across two raters. The coefficients in this table are representative of 8 multiple regression runs obtained with different permutations of designations as rater 1 or rater 2. The differences between these runs are small and do not change any conclusion from the data. If instead of means across two raters scores from a single rater are used as predictors explained variance drops by a small amount but the pattern of coefficients stays the same
The semipartial correlation is the correlation of residuals with the OSCE-criterion where the effect of MMI is taken out of FIR and vice versa