Table 2.

Clusters with a significant increase (T6-T0) in connectivity with the Hippocampus

Model	Cluster		size p-FDR	peak p-unc	Anatomical area	Covering
	x, y, z	Size				%	Voxels
1 (PE vs. PC)	-50, -64, 36	376	0.008716	0.000004	Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division Left	60	225
					Angular Gyrus Left	38	141
					Not Labelled	3	10
	-30, -70, 22	215	0.046003	0.000003	Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division Left	33	71
					Angular Gyrus Left	4	8
					Not Labelled	63	136
2 (PE&CT vs. PE&CTc vs. PC)	-50, -64, 32	535	0.0003	0.000008	Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division Left	57	303
					Angular Gyrus Left	16	87
					Not Labelled	27	145
Post-hoc for 2   (PE&CTc vs. PC)	-50, -64, 44	265	0.035973	0.000023	Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division Left	60	158
					Angular Gyrus Left	37	98
					Not Labelled	3	9
Post-hoc for 2    (PE&CT vs. PC)	-30, -72, 20	334	0.003614	0.000002	Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division Left	53	177
					Angular Gyrus Left	7	25
					Not Labelled	40	132
4 (SYN vs. PC)	-38, -60, 32	381	0.001073	0.000007	Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division Left	51	194
					Angular Gyrus Left	10	38
					Not Labelled	39	149
4L (SYN vs. PC)	-46, -66, 42	297	0.00562	0.000012	Lateral Occipital Cortex, superior division Left	84	248
					Not Labelled	16	49

All from the seed-voxel analysis. With the exception of model 4L, the significant clusters within each model demonstrated increased connectivity with the right Hippocampus. c control; CT cognitive training; PC pure control; PE physical exercise; SYN synergic; VD vitamin D; vs. versus