Table 2.
Authors | Study design/subjects | Research question | Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Assaf et al. 2015 30 | Seven participant (8–17 y), 12 teeth | Visualisation and measurement of revitalisation of the dental pulp after dental trauma using MRI; comparison of signal intensity of trauma affected and non-affected teeth |
|
Cankar et al. 2020 31 | 12 participants (34.4 + −7.3 y), 72 teeth | Quantification of dental pulp signal in teeth with caries; correlation between signal and extent of caries lesion |
|
Juerchott et al. 2021 33 | 70 participants (three cohorts: 27.5 ± 3.1, 42.2 ± 11.6, 44.1 ± 14.6 y), 1585 teeth | Investigation of PCE patterns in dMRI in healthy teeth |
|
Tesfai et al. 2022 32 | Five participants | Comparison of intraoral coil with conventional head and surface coils and CBCT in terms of SNR and visibility |
|
CBCT, cone-beam CT; PCE, pulpal contrast enhancement; SNR, signal-to-noise-ratio.