Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 1;50(8):2281–2291. doi: 10.1177/03635465221097939

TABLE 1.

Statistical Comparisons of Mechanical Propertiesa

Group Maximum Load, N (median ± SD) (p-value) Stiffness, N/mm (median ± SD) (p-value) Modulus, MPa (median ± SD) (p-value) Failure Stress, MPa

Intact 199 ± 35 144 ± 20 25 ± 3.7 104 ± 7
Gap 92 ± 15 (.100) 21 ± 10 (.100) NA NA
Direct 155 ± 22 (.036) 38 ± 12 (.036) 5.3 ± 1.3 (.100) 8 ± 2.5 (.100)
ELAC 166 ± 36 (.052) 33 ± 6 (.022) 3.5 ± 0.4 (.100) 3.8 ± 0.9 (.100)
ELAC + MSC 178 ± 50 (.554) 46 ± 12 (.022) 5.6 ± 2.1 (.059) 9 ± 3.2 (.059)
a

Paired comparisons of biomechanical properties of repaired tendons to those of intact contralateral tendons. Data are reported as median ± SD with p-values in parentheses. The lack of significance in bold implies complete convergence of repair to intact. ELAC, electrochemically aligned collagen; MSC, mesenchymal stem cell; NA, not available.