Skip to main content
. 2023 May 2;17:11782234231167655. doi: 10.1177/11782234231167655

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate analyses (Cox proportional hazard model) for DRFS in patients with RD.

Variable Patients with RD
n Univariate
Multivariate
HR 95% CI P HR 95% CI P
Age
 >50 120 1.00
 ⩽50 143 1.14 0.65-2.00 .64
T category
 1-2 193 1.00
 3 70 1.48 0.82-2.65 .19
Nodal status
 Negative 121 1.00 1.00
 Positive 142 1.90 1.06-3.42 .032 2.13 1.12-4.03 .020
ER
 Positive 179 1.00 1.00
 Negative 81 3.34 1.91-5.83 <.0001 1.57 0.71-3.45 .26
PgR
 Positive 157 1.00 1.00
 Negative 102 3.01 1.70-5.34 .0002 1.16 0.52-2.58 .71
Grade
 1-2 142 1.00 1.00
 3 107 2.14 1.18-3.88 .013 0.80 0.39-1.63 .54
Intrinsic subtype
 Luminal A 111 1.00 1.00
 The others 152 4.77 2.38-9.55 <.0001 1.81 0.68-4.82 .24
TP53 signature
 Wild-type signature 166 1.00 1.00
 Mutant signature 97 4.68 2.58-8.50 <.0001 2.50 1.09-5.74 .030

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DRFS, distant recurrence-free survival; ER, estrogen receptor; HR, hazard ratio; PgR, progesterone receptor; RD, residual disease.