Skip to main content
. 2023 May 18;16(5):770–777. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2023.05.15

Table 3. Changes in axial length in different groups.

Follow-ups L-ICF group (n=22) L-CCF group (n=22) t P M-ICF group (n=28) M-CCF group (n=25) t P
6mo 0.10±0.05 0.09±0.04 0.183 0.855 0.05±0.03 0.08±0.03 -2.218 0.031
1y 0.17±0.06 0.18±0.06 -0.126 0.900 0.12±0.05 0.17±0.05 -3.253 0.002
1.5y 0.24±0.08 0.27±0.10 -0.916 0.365 0.20±0.08 0.25±0.08 -2.364 0.022
2y 0.28±0.10 0.31±0.10 -0.815 0.420 0.23±0.08 0.30±0.11 -2.524 0.015

L-ICF: Low myopia subjects fitted with increased compression factor (1.75 D) ortho-k; L-CCF: Low myopia subjects fitted with conventional compression factor (0.75 D) ortho-k; M-ICF: Moderate myopia subjects fitted with increased compression factor (1.75 D) ortho-k; M-CCF: Moderate myopia subjects fitted with conventional compression factor (0.75 D) ortho-k.

mean±SD, mm