Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 27;32(6):1659–1670. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03337-2

Table 1.

Participants and groups

ID Participants Age: range (median) Sex Race Ethnicity Experience: range (median) PROMs bookmarked
Clinicians Years as SLP
A 7 SLPs 30–62 (40) 7 w, 0 m 7 White 7 Non-Hispanic 6–34 (10) 1,2,3,4
B 10 SLPs 25–54, 3 did not report (33) 9 w, 1 m 9 White, 1 Black 10 Non-Hispanic 1–20 (6.5) 1,2,3,4
C 8 SLPs 27–40 (33.5) 8 w, 0 m 6 White, 1 Asian, 1 Other 8 Non-Hispanic 3.5–14 (9.5) 1,2,3,4
D 6 SLPs 26–65 (55.5) 6 w, 0 m; 6 White 6 Non-Hispanic 3–42 (22.5) 1,3,4
E 11 SLPs 27–67 (48) 11 w, 0 m 10 White, 1 Black 11 Non-Hispanic 3–30 (25) 1,2,4
Care partners Years as care partner
  F 4 partners of PWA 60–76 (69) 3 w, 1 m 3 White, 1 Asian 1 Hispanic, 3 non-Hispanic 1–7.5 (1.5) 1,2,3,4
G 6 partners of PWA 35–69 (61.5) 6 w, 0 m 4 White, 2 Black 6 Non-Hispanic 2–10 (5.25) 1,2,3,4
H 4 partners of PWA 41–68, one did not report (62) 4 w, 0 m 4 White 4 Non-Hispanic 1–5.5 (3.25) 1,2,3,4
I 5 partners of PWA 48–75 (62) 4 w, 1 m 5 White 5 Non-Hispanic 1–18 (3) 1,2,3,4
J 7 partners of PwPD 55–76 (67) 6 w, 1 m 7 White 7 Non-Hispanic 2–15 (7) 1,3
K 4 partners of PwTBI 57–77 (64.5) 3 w, 1 m 4 White 4 Non-Hispanic 2–46 (14) 1,2,3
People with communication disorders Years with condition
 L 6 PwPD 58–76 (68) 1 w, 5 m 6 White 6 Non-Hispanic 2–15 (8.5) 1,3
M 3 PWA 49–76 (62) 0 w, 3 m 2 White, 1 Black 3 Non-Hispanic 1.5–4.5 (3.5) 1
N 2 PWA 49–76 (62.5) 0 w, 2 m 2 White 2 Non-Hispanic 1.5–3.5 (2.5) 2,3,4
O 3 PWA 38–69 (53) 0 w, 3 m 2 White, 1 Black 3 Non-Hispanic 1.5–7 (4) 1,2,3,4
P 5 PWA 38–73 (55) 1 w, 4 m 4 White, 1 Black 5 Non-Hispanic 1–6 (4) 1,2,3,4
Q 3 PwTBI 30–77 (46) 0 w, 3 m 3 White 3 Non-Hispanic 3–23 (5) 1,2,3

SLP = speech-language pathologist, PWA = person with aphasia; PwPD = person with Parkinson’s disease; PwTBI = person with TBI. PROMs Bookmarked: 1 = Communicative Participation Item Bank, 2 = Neuro-QoL Cognition, 3 = Neuro-QoL Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities, 4 = Aphasia Communication Outcome Measure. Group IDs here do not match those presented in Cohen, Harnish et al. (2021). All demographic variables were self-identified by participants