Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 1;59(2):125–135. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07639-6

Table II. Anamnestic and follow-up characteristics of the sample included in the study (N.=105).

Variables Median [IQR] or frequencies Numerosity
Anamnestic clinical variables
FAI Good participation level: 101 (96.2%)
Compromised participation level: 4 (3.8%)
105
mRS, anamnestic 0.0 [0.0] 97
Variables collected at admission evaluation
NIHSS, admission 6.0 [6.0] 103
Variables collected at follow-up evaluation
FAI 13.0 [20.0] 105
FAI, dichotomized score Good participation level: 44 (41.9%)
Compromised participation level: 61 (58.1%)
105
Type of evaluation In-person: 66 (62.9%)
Through telephonic interview: 39 (37.1%)
105
mBI 86.0 [40.0] 104
mRS 4.0 [2.0] 105
MoCA, dichotomized score Altered cognitive status: 29 (35%)
Normal cognitive status: 53 (65%)
82
Cohabitation No: 21 (20.0%)
Yes: 77 (73.3%)
98
Barriers _ level of the house Ground floor only: 14 (13.3%)
Higher levels: 73 (69.5%)
87
Severe aphasia No: 17 (16.2%)
Yes: 6 (5.7%)
23

FAI: Frenchay Activities Index; IQR: interquartile range; mBI: Modified Barthel Index; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; mRS: Modified Rankin Scale; NIHSS: National Institutes of Stroke Scale.