Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 15;33(3):394–414. doi: 10.1080/09638237.2023.2182421

Table 3.

Acceptability outcomes.

Author year country Design Sample size Sampling Nature of intervention Timing of outcome measurement Acceptability outcome Response rate
Burdett et al. (2010) UK Cross-sectional 325 Convenience Mandatory academic activity Post-intervention 70% rated the session excellent.
56% thought the structure was excellent, 42% thought it was good.
66% rated content as excellent, 33% as good.
100% would recommend the session.
Not reported
DallaPiazza et al. (2018) US Cross-sectional 536 Convenience Mandatory academic activity Post-intervention 63% agreed to a great and 26% to a moderate degree that they felt more comfortable using concrete tools delivered.
71% agreed to a great and 21% to a moderate degree that additional training on this topic would be beneficial.
72% felt objectives had been met considerable/in very high degree.
30–41%
Knaak (2018) Canada UPPI 198 Self-selected convenience Voluntary Post-intervention 87.6% strongly agreed or agreed the program addresses their learning needs.
93.8% strongly agreed or agreed it was relevant to their practice.
92.2% strongly agreed or agreed it enhanced their knowledge in the area.
78.1% strongly agreed or agreed they would recommend it.
77.16%
Shah et al. (2014) India CPPI 91 Convenience Mandatory
academic activity
Post-intervention 89–100% rated it as useful and easy to understand.
95% felt it will change their practice and would recommend it.
9–22% reported some of the materials made them uncomfortable.
38–40% report feeling embarrassed to share their opinions.
87–93% felt they could be honest about their beliefs.
100%
Sherman et al. (2019) US Cross-sectional 31 Not reported Not mentioned Post-intervention 88% qualified it as excellent and 13% as very good.
100% would strongly recommend it.
100%
Webb and Sergison, (2003) UK Cross-sectional 140 Self-selected convenience Voluntary Huddersfield: Post-intervention Cardiff: 2–7 years post-intervention Huddersfield:
98% rated the course as good or excellent.
75% said training met most to all of their needs.
99% stated the course outcomes were achieved.
96% were satisfied/very satisfied with the practical info given.
21% said they would like further training
Cardiff:
83% rated the course as relevant or highly relevant.
79% said this was the first such training attended.
52% felt they would like further training.
Huddersfield: 97%, Cardiff: 62%

CPPI: controlled pre-post study.