Skip to main content
. 2023 May 8;13(5):e066524. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066524

Table 1.

Rating scales, summary results and comparisons across the primary outcome questionnaire domains

PPE Q8 speak to staff Q9 be heard by staff Q10 speak to patient Q11 be heard by patient Q14 how safe does it feel Q17 comfortable
Rating scale From: 0—no confidence 0—no confidence 0—no confidence 0—no confidence 1—very unsafe 1—very uncomfortable
To: 10—fully confident 10—fully confident 10—fully confident 10—fully confident 7—very safe 7—very comfortable
RPE type FFP3 5.1 (2.4) (1–10) 4.9 (2.3) (1–10) 4.8 (2.4) (1–10) 4.7 (2.5) (1–10) 5.4 (1.0) (3–7) 3 (1.4) (1–6)
Bubble 7.5 (2.4) (1–10) 7.1 (2.3) (1–10) 7.8 (2.1) (2–10) 7.4 (2.4) (1–10) 6.2 (0.9) (3–7) 5.6 (1.6) (1–7)
Comparison Mean difference 2.38 2.16 2.99 2.7 0.73 2.68
95% CI 1.66 to 3.11 1.45 to 2.88 2.36 to 3.62 1.97 to 3.43 0.45 to 0.99 2.23 to 3.14
Favours Bubble Favours Bubble Favours Bubble Favours Bubble Favours Bubble Favours Bubble
Adjusted p value <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

FFP, filtering face piece; RPE, respiratory protective equipment.