Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 27;17:1156453. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1156453

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The probiotics administration for restoring surgery/anesthesia stress-induced and perioperative cefazolin-induced gut dysbacteria, respectively. (A,B) The differential species analysis in the genus level of Grp CTL, Grp CEF, Grp S at 1 and 3 weeks after surgery; (C,D) The differential species analysis in the genus level of Grp CTL, Grp S, Grp SC at 1 week and 3 weeks after surgery; (E,G) The differential species analysis in the genus level of Grp CTL, Grp S, Grp SP, Grp SC, Grp SCP at 1 and 3 weeks after surgery; (F,H) Surgery/anesthesia stress increased the relative abundance of Streptococcus at 1 week (q = 0.7693, p = 0.0399) while probiotics could decrease it (q = 0.5489, p = 0.0314); cefazolin could increase the relative abundance of Streptococcus at 3 weeks after surgery (q = 0.3125, p = 0.0314) compared with surgery group (n = 9, Wilcoxon rank sum test). Grp, group; CTL, control; S, surgery; SC, surgery combined with cefazolin; SP, surgery combined with probiotics; SCP, surgery combined with cefazolin and probiotics.