Concilio 2021.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomised controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Text messaging (Social Support Behavioral Code)
Control (text messaging ‐ medical facts)
Overall
Included criteria: eligibility criteria were: (a) NLGNs employed as RNs for the first time, (b) ages 19 to 37 years (millennials and post‐millennials) as the majority joining the workforce (NursingLicensure.org, 2020), (c) proficient in English, (d) working in an acute care facility as an RN during the first year of hire, (e) had a working personal smartphone, (f) had the ability to send and receive text messages, (g) had an active and working personal email account, (h) were willing to participate for 6 weeks, (i) completed survey instruments at baseline, week 3, and week 6, (j) agreed to not use or carry their smartphone while performing direct patient care, and (k) assumed any data charges for text messages Excluded criteria: exclusion criteria were NLGNs who had worked as an RN on another floor or at another organisation Pretreatment: NR Compliance rate: Response rate: 100% Type of healthcare worker: exclusively nurses who were in their first year of hire. |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Text messaging (Social Support Behavioral Code)
Control (text messaging ‐ medical facts)
|
|
Outcomes |
Perceived Sense of Stress (PSS)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: NR Country: USA Setting: two urban health care systems located in western Pennsylvania and southern California. Comments: NR Authors name: Lisa Concil Institution: Lecturer and Clinical Instructor, San Diego State University Email: 10006 Maya Linda Road, #5207, San Diego, CA 92126 Address: lconcilio@sdsu.edu Time period: NR |
|
Notes | PSS included in analysis 3.1 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Randomization was conducted using an online random sequence generator (Random.org, 2019)." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "A $20 gift card was sent to participants who completed the study requirements. Additionally, the first four participants who completed the study at the end of week 6 were awarded another $50 gift card." We assume that consecutive nurses were randomised. Difficult to judge whether nurses or the investigator could possibly foresee assignment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear whether participants were blinded. The control group received 'placebo' text messages. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Unclear whether participants were blinded whereas outcomes were self‐reported. The control group received 'placebo' text messages. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Attrition rate is low. (21/22 were included in the analysis). Reason provided. Not reported whether the participant that was lost to follow‐up differed from the other participants. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No trial registration or no study protocol reported, nor did we find one online. No indication of selective reporting. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Not reported whether there were any baseline differences between groups on stress, gender, age. |