Moench 2021.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods |
Study design: randomised controlled trial Study grouping: parallel group |
|
Participants |
Baseline characteristics Self‐Care Traumatic Episode Protocol
Control (wait list)
Overall
Included criteria: participants were considered suitable for study inclusion if they met the following criteria: they were willing to participate voluntarily in treatment; they provided written consent; and were licenced mental health clinicians who had taken basic EMDR training. Excluded criteria: participants were excluded if they disclosed severe levels of clinical distress, if they were concurrently receiving psychological treatment during the study period, or if they endorsed suicidal intent. Pretreatment: NR Compliance rate: 94% Response rate: NR Type of healthcare worker: 34 participants included master’s level clinical social workers (n = 8), Canadian Certified Counsellors (n = 4), master’s or PhD‐level registered psychologists (n = 21), and psychiatrists (n = 1). |
|
Interventions |
Intervention characteristics Self‐Care Traumatic Episode Protocol
Control (wait list)
|
|
Outcomes |
Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS‐21)
|
|
Identification |
Sponsorship source: the authors received no specific grant or financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Country: Canada Setting: NR Comments: NR Authors name: Judy Moench Institution: Judy Moench Psychological Services Ltd. Email: jmoench@telusplanet.net Address: #260, 10230 142 Street, NW Edmonton, AB, T5N 3Y6, Canada. Time period: June 2020 |
|
Notes | Included in analysis 4.1 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Using a randomisation sequence based on a random number table. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Participants were randomized by a research assistant. Insufficient information to understand whether intervention allocations could have been foreseen by participants in advance of, during, enrolment. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants were not blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants were not blinded whereas outcomes are self‐reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 5% lost to follow‐up. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | No trial registration, nor did we find one online. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | Response rate was not reported. |