Skip to main content
. 2023 May 12;2023(5):CD002892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub6

Saganha 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT with individual participants, Portugal
Participants Physiotherapists scoring more than 26 on Emotional Exhaustion subscale of MBI out of 106 screened with MBI, and not familiar with Qigong; Experimental n = 8 Control n = 8
Interventions 1) Experimental: Qigong exercise: posture, breathing and mind focus; classes 20 min/day 1 week; self‐treatment 2X / day 2 weeks, total 3 weeks
2) Control: waiting list for 3 weeks; after that they got the treatment as well
Outcomes MBI
Identification  
Notes  MBI‐EE included in analysis 2.1 
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "the design was a prospective randomized controlled study"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "the design was a prospective randomized controlled study"
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Participants not blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Participants were not blinded whereas outcomes are self‐reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Outcomes for all participants reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Baseline data not reported for the RCT group only
Other bias Low risk We did not find any indications of other sources of bias