Saganha 2012.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | RCT with individual participants, Portugal | |
Participants | Physiotherapists scoring more than 26 on Emotional Exhaustion subscale of MBI out of 106 screened with MBI, and not familiar with Qigong; Experimental n = 8 Control n = 8 | |
Interventions | 1) Experimental: Qigong exercise: posture, breathing and mind focus; classes 20 min/day 1 week; self‐treatment 2X / day 2 weeks, total 3 weeks 2) Control: waiting list for 3 weeks; after that they got the treatment as well |
|
Outcomes | MBI | |
Identification | ||
Notes | MBI‐EE included in analysis 2.1 | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "the design was a prospective randomized controlled study" |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote: "the design was a prospective randomized controlled study" |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants not blinded. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Participants were not blinded whereas outcomes are self‐reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Outcomes for all participants reported |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Baseline data not reported for the RCT group only |
Other bias | Low risk | We did not find any indications of other sources of bias |