Skip to main content
. 2023 May 12;2023(5):CD002892. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002892.pub6

Shapiro 2005.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT, USA
Participants 38 healthcare professionals including physicians, nurses, social workers, physical therapists and psychologists
Interventions 1) Experimental: Mindfulness‐Based Stress Reduction programme: 8 weekly 2‐hour training sessions about employing the techniques involved in sitting meditation, body scan, Hatha yoga, 3‐minute breathing space (a "minimeditation") and a "loving kindness" meditation.
2) Control: no intervention
Outcomes MBI, Perceived Stress Scale, Brief Symptom Inventory
Identification  
Notes PSS included in analysis 2.1
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "Participants were randomly assigned to an 8‐week MBSR group or a wait‐list control group." (p. 167)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes High risk Participants not blinded.
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
All outcomes High risk Participants were not blinded whereas outcomes are self‐reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes High risk Quote: "Owing to the pilot nature of this study and the small sample size, we did not perform intention‐to‐treat analyses but compared only those participants who did not drop out" (p. 169)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk We did not find any indications of other sources of bias