Table 4.
Set 1 | Variate 1: Cognition |
Variate 2: Socio- Occupational Functioning |
Set 2 | Variate 1: Arousal Ratings |
Variate 2: Late Emotional ERP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Social Engagement/Withdrawal | −.27 | −.28 | Average P1 | −.38 | .22 |
Interpersonal Communication | −.49 | −.26 | Neutral EPN | −.37 | .08 |
Independence-Performance | −.32 | .15 | Early P3 Emotional Δ | .16 | .45 |
Independence-Competence | −.25 | −.11 | Pleasant Late P3 | .06 | .43 |
Recreation | −.27 | .21 | Unpleasant Late P3 | .14 | .27 |
Prosocial | −.61 | .05 | Early N3 Unpleasant Δ | −.38 | −.42 |
Occupation/Employment | −.57 | .39 | N1 Unpleasant Δ | .07 | .10 |
Verbal Memory | −.73 | −.10 | Neutral P2 | .37 | −.11 |
Digit Sequencing | −.68 | .18 | Pleasant P2 | .24 | −.28 |
Token Motor | −.37 | −.22 | Unpleasant LPP | −.25 | −.45 |
Verbal Fluency | −.66 | .04 | Average Pleasantness | −.27 | .42 |
Symbol Coding | −.72 | −.34 | Neutral Arousal | −.59 | −.08 |
Tower of London | −.67 | .03 | Unpleasant Arousal | .65 | −.20 |
Note. Color of variate weights indicate their direction, saturation indicates their intensity. Weights > .30 are considered to meaningfully contribute to the correlation between sets. Set 1 (cognition and social function) is shown on the left. Set 2 (emotional ERPs and ratings) are shown on the right. Weights for each variate maximize the relationship between each set. 2 variates resulted from this analysis, indicating that there are 2 independent relationships/correlations between input variables.