Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychiatry Res. 2023 Apr 24;324:115227. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2023.115227

Table 4.

CCA Weights for Sets 1 and 2

Set 1 Variate 1:
Cognition
Variate 2:
Socio-
Occupational
Functioning
Set 2 Variate
1:
Arousal
Ratings
Variate 2:
Late
Emotional
ERP
Social Engagement/Withdrawal −.27 −.28 Average P1 −.38 .22
Interpersonal Communication −.49 −.26 Neutral EPN −.37 .08
Independence-Performance −.32 .15 Early P3 Emotional Δ .16 .45
Independence-Competence −.25 −.11 Pleasant Late P3 .06 .43
Recreation −.27 .21 Unpleasant Late P3 .14 .27
Prosocial −.61 .05 Early N3 Unpleasant Δ −.38 −.42
Occupation/Employment −.57 .39 N1 Unpleasant Δ .07 .10
Verbal Memory −.73 −.10 Neutral P2 .37 −.11
Digit Sequencing −.68 .18 Pleasant P2 .24 −.28
Token Motor −.37 −.22 Unpleasant LPP −.25 −.45
Verbal Fluency −.66 .04 Average Pleasantness −.27 .42
Symbol Coding −.72 −.34 Neutral Arousal −.59 −.08
Tower of London −.67 .03 Unpleasant Arousal .65 −.20

Note. Color of variate weights indicate their direction, saturation indicates their intensity. Weights > .30 are considered to meaningfully contribute to the correlation between sets. Set 1 (cognition and social function) is shown on the left. Set 2 (emotional ERPs and ratings) are shown on the right. Weights for each variate maximize the relationship between each set. 2 variates resulted from this analysis, indicating that there are 2 independent relationships/correlations between input variables.