Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 6;37(3):911–918. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00970-7

Table 2.

Electrical impedance tomography

Data T0 T1 T2 T3 P value
TIV (ml) 400 [333; 423] 366 [297; 602] 420 [325; 620] 364 [274; 468] 0.132
 Dorsal 164 [106; 215] 153 [109; 316] 166 [116; 280] 143 [109; 254] 0.114
 Ventral 206 [169; 266] 213 [164; 328] 239 [181; 333] 214 [156; 240] 0.125
∆EELI (ml) 0 [0; 0] 258 [56; 332]a 276 [148; 451]b 290 [184; 412]c  < 0.001
 Dorsal 0 [0; 0] 154 [72; 202]a 143 [42; 327]b 133 [107; 232]c  < 0.001
 Ventral 0 [0; 0] 73 [− 16; 157]a 76 [38; 173]b 77 [58; 206]c  < 0.001
Inhomogeneity index 70 [41; 92] 55 [40; 69] 60 [38; 72] 67 [39; 73] 0.114

All data are expressed as median [25th–75th percentile]

T0 baseline assessment, T1 assessment soon after the end of the treatment, T2 assessment 1 h after the end of the treatment, T3 assessment 3 h after the end of the treatment, TIV tidal impedance variation, ∆EELI difference of end-expiratory lung impedance from T0

ap < 0.05 T1 vs. T0

bp < 0.05 T2 vs. T0

cp < 0.05 T3 vs. T0