Table 3.

Systematic braiding steps 3 and 4: feasibility research phases, methods, and outcomes

Research phase	Methods and measures	Qualitative or quantitative	Feasibility area of focusa	Feasibility outcomea
Step 3: Systematic braiding: pilot braided curriculum with parents	Self-report survey	Quant	Limited efficacy	Pre-post changes in self-reported smoking, smoke-free home rules, and parent stress
	Semi-structured qualitative interview	Qual	Acceptability	Satisfaction, appropriateness, intent to continue use
			Demand	Interest and intent to use
			Practicality	Ability to carry out intervention activities
Step 4: Systematic braiding: gather feedback from Providers and modify curriculum	Semi-structured qualitative interview	Qual	Implementation	Factors that affect ease or difficulty of implementation, fit with SafeCare modules
			Practicality	Effects on participants, ability to carry out intervention activities
			Acceptability	Satisfaction, appropriateness, intent to continue use
			Demand	Perceived demand, interest and intent to use
	Brief Provider perceptions survey	Quant	Implementation	Implementation barriers, fit of SFH within SafeCare modules
			Acceptability	Appropriateness, intent to continue use
			Practicality	Effects on participants
			Demand	Intent to use (perception of parents), intent to attend trainings (for Providers)

Note: Qual qualitative data collected, Quant Quantitative data collected

^aFeasibility areas of focus and outcomes are based on Bowen et al. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452–457