Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Mar 20;3(4):100359. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100359

TABLE 5.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative likelihood ratios for antepartum risk factors

Antepartum risk factor Number of cohorts Cases of SD Sensitivity Specificity Positive LR Negative LR
At least 1 risk factor (AMA) 16,088 344 2.1 (1.9–2.3) 98.4 (98.3–98.5) 1.31 (1.17–1.47) 0.99 (0.99–1.00)
At least 2 risk factors (AMA or nulliparity) 2033 35 1.7 (1.2–2.4) 98.3 (98.2–98.4) 1.04 (0.74–1.44) 1.0 (0.99–1.01)
At least 3 risk factors (AMA or nulliparity or obesity) 127 6 4.7 (1.8–10.0) 98.3 (98.2–98.4) 2.85 (1.30–6.23) 0.97 (0.93–1.01)
At least 4 risk factors (AMA or nulliparity or obesity or AA or Hispanic) 38 3 7.9 (1.7–21.4) 98.3 (98.2–98.5) 4.76 (1.61–14.1) 0.94 (0.85–1.03)
At least 5 risk factors (AMA or nulliparity or Obesity or AA or Hispanic or private insurance) 20 2 10.0 (1.2–31.7) 98.3 (98.2–98.4) 6.03 (1.62–22.5) 0.92 (0.79–1.06)

The following risk factors were assessed: maternal age ≥35, nulliparity, prepregnancy body mass index ≥30, African American or Hispanic race or ethnicity, and private insurance.

AA, African American; AMA, advanced maternal age; LR, likelihood ratio; SD, shoulder dystocia.