Skip to main content
. 2023 May 12:1–31. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s11292-023-09571-z

Table 3.

Participant characteristics and covariates (N = 2,038)

Variable Mean Std. Dev Min Max
Desire to call police [0,100] 61.7 33.93 0 100
Perceived threat [0,100] 55.8 30.78 0 100
Age 41.9 13.1 18 85
Gender identity
  Female 47% 0.5 0 1
  Male 53% 0.5 0 1
  Other identity 0.5% 0.07 0 1
Marital status
  Never married 35% 0.48 0 1
  Divorced 8% 0.27 0 1
  Separated 1% 0.12 0 1
  Widowed 2% 0.12 0 1
  Married 48% 0.5 0 1
  Domestic partnership 6% 0.24 0 1
Education
  Less than high school 1% 0.08 0 1
  High school graduate 10% 0.3 0 1
  Some college 18% 0.38 0 1
  2-year degree 9% 0.29 0 1
  4-year degree 45% 0.5 0 1
  Masters or Professional degree 16% 0.36 0 1
  Doctorate 1% 0.12 0 1
Employment
  Permanently disabled 1% 0.11 0 1
  Retired 6% 0.24 0 1
  Student 2% 0.12 0 1
  Taking care of home or family 4% 0.18 0 1
  Unemployed 5% 0.22 0 1
  Temporarily laid off  < 1% 0.04 0 1
  Working part time 14% 0.34 0 1
  Working full time 69% 0.46 0 1
Household characteristics
  Size of household 2.88 4.27 1 150
  Children in household 0.70 1.67 0 40
  Household income* 2.80 2.22 0 10
Political views
  Very liberal 13% 0.33 0 1
  Liberal 32% 0.47 0 1
  Moderate 25% 0.43 0 1
Variable Mean Std. Dev Min Max
Conservative 22% 0.42 0 1
Very conservative 9% 0.28 0 1
Rent or own
  Rent 36% 0.48 0 1
  Own 59% 0.49 0 1
  Other housing arrangement 5% 0.22 0 1
Urbanicity
  Rural 18% 0.38 0 1
  Suburban 50% 0.5 0 1
  Urban 32% 0.47 0 1
Vignette (racial description and severity)
  White, low-severity and high ambiguity 25% 0.43 0 1
  Black, low-severity and high ambiguity 25% 0.44 0 1
  White, high-severity and low ambiguity 25% 0.44 0 1
  Black, high-severity and low ambiguity 25% 0.43 0 1
Racial identity(s) (multiple possible)
  White identity 82% 0.38 0 1
  Black identity 19% 0.59 0 2
  Native identity 1% 0.11 0 1
  Asian identity 8% 0.27 0 1
  Pacific identity  < 1% 0.04 0 1
  Other racial identity 4% 0.27 0 2
  Hispanic identity (asked separately from racial identity) 9% 0.29 0 1
Government assistance(s)
  Medical assistance 30% 0.46 0 1
  Cash assistance 9% 0.29 0 1
  Food assistance 21% 0.41 0 1
  Social disability assistance 13% 0.34 0 1
  Unemployment assistance 23% 0.42 0 1
  Housing assistance 9% 0.28 0 1
  Other assistance 4% 0.19 0 1
  Any assistance indicated 56% 0.5 0 1
Community efficacy variables (0 to 4)
  get along with each other? 3.08 0.79 0 4
  are willing to help their neighbor? 2.96 0.93 0 4
  share the same values? 2.62 0.95 0 4
  can be trusted? 2.79 0.95 0 4
  would break up a fight if one broke out in the neighborhood? 2.41 1.06 0 4
  Community efficacy sum [0,20] 13.86 3.67 0 20
Community crime concern variables (0 to 4) Mean Std. Dev Min Max
Muggings or robberies (in the past year) are a problem 0.77 1.11 0 4
Home burglaries (in the past year) are a problem 0.86 1.09 0 4
Car thefts (in the past year) are a problem 0.97 1.18 0 4
Violent fights (in the past year) are a problem 0.77 1.18 0 4
Sexual assaults (in the past year) are a problem 0.70 1.19 0 4
Shootings or stabbings (in the past year) are a problem 0.78 1.26 0 4
Community crime concerns sum [0,24] 4.85 6.37 0 24
Community physical disorder variables (0 to 4)
  Litter, broken glass, or trash on the sidewalks and streets 1.06 1.13 0 4
  Vacant or deserted houses, buildings, or storefronts 0.78 1.12 0 4
  Community physical disorder sum [0,8] 1.84 2.09 0 8
Community social disorder variables (0 to 4)
  People selling or using drugs 1.06 1.27 0 4
  Teenagers hanging around on the streets 0.80 1.11 0 4
  People being drunk or rowdy in public spaces 0.83 1.19 0 4
  Community social disorder sum [0,12] 2.69 3.23 0 12
Community precautions variables (0 to 4)
  avoid certain streets or places? 0.93 1.21 0 4
  stay in at night? 1.25 1.35 0 4
  not travel alone? 0.96 1.23 0 4
  carry a weapon? 0.69 1.2 0 4
  Community precautions sum [0,16] 3.83 4.04 0 16
Crime victimization variables
  Participant was victim of a serious crime (five years) 9% 0.28 0 1
  Household member was victim of a serious crime (five years) 6% 0.24 0 1
Police legitimacy variables (0 to 4)**
  Police in my neighborhood are respected 2.93 0.99 0 4
  I generally support how police act in my neighborhood 3.01 1.03 0 4
  Police in my neighborhood are fair in interactions and decisions 2.93 1.03 0 4
  Police are responsive to neighborhood concerns 2.98 1.04 0 4
  Police legitimacy sum [0,16] 11.85 3.64 0 16
Police concern (over next 5 years) variables (0 to 4)**
  Concern police will stop you 0.88 1.13 0 4
  Concern police will search you 0.70 1.13 0 4
  Concern police will use insulting language toward you 0.70 1.15 0 4
  Concern police will arrest you 0.62 1.13 0 4
  Concern police will use physical force against you 0.67 1.16 0 4
  Concern police will kill you 0.58 1.15 0 4
  Police concern (over next 5 years) sum [0,24] 4.14 6.2 0 24
Police contact (over the past 5 years) variables (0 to 3 +) Mean Std. Dev Min Max
Police stops 0.58 0.83 0 3
Police searches 0.25 0.64 0 3
Police insulting language 0.24 0.63 0 3
Police arrests 0.17 0.57 0 3
Police usages of physical force 0.17 0.55 0 3
Police contact (over past 5 years) sum [0,15] 1.41 2.63 0 15
Law enforcement affiliation variables
  I work in law enforcement 4% 0.2 0 1
  My partner works in law enforcement 3% 0.18 0 1
  Close friend(s) works in law enforcement 12% 0.33 0 1
  Family member(s) works in law enforcement 11% 0.31 0 1
  Law enforcement affiliation sum [0,4] 0.31 0.68 0 4

* Household income measured in $20,000 tranches, with 0 corresponding to “Less than $20,000”, 1 corresponding to “$20,000—$39,999”, 2 corresponding to “$40,000—$59,999”, and 10 corresponding to truncated value of “200,000 or more”

** These variables are not included in models that interact vignette exposure with participants’ political views, as these variables covary with political views and would overcontrol interactions