Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 21;94(5):349–356. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-329955

Table 2.

Comparing the relationship between different life course models of physical activity with cognitive function at age 69

Physical activity life course model ACE-III, age 69 Word learning test, age 69 Visual search speed, age 69
f P value f P value f P value
Saturated model Reference Reference Reference
No effect 12.42 <0.01 13.11 <0.01 2.61 <0.01
Accumulation 1.41 0.21 0.55 0.77 1.79 0.11
Sensitive period 1 (ages 36–43) 10.70 <0.01 10.05 <0.01 2.70 <0.01
Sensitive period 2 (age 53) 3.37 <0.01 6.31 <0.01 2.51 0.02
Sensitive period 3 (ages 60–69) 8.60 <0.01 6.92 <0.01 1.92 0.07
Best model* Accumulation Accumulation Accumulation

All models are adjusted for sex.

Categories at three age spans were chosen to represent physical activity in the life course and expressed in binary form (inactive vs moderately/most active). The ‘saturated model’ is the most complicated model that contains all parameters.

*Higher (less significant) p values indicate that the life course model assessed fits the data as well as the reference model; The lower the f value, the better the model fit.

ACE-III, Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination.