Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 12.
Published in final edited form as: World J Urol. 2015 May 17;34(1):97–103. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1583-7

Table 3.

Multivariable analysis of clinical and pathologic parameters available prior definitive treatment for predicting recurrence and overall death in the 125 patients with cM0 primary urethral carcinoma

RFS OS


Variable Hazard ratio (95 %-CI) p value Hazard ratio (95 %-CI) p value

Clinical tumor stage 2.04 0.40 1.17 0.85
 ≥cT3 versus ≤cT2 (0.41–13.09) (0.19–5.69)
Clinical nodal stage 48.64 <0.001 9.80 0.026
 cN+ versus cN0/cNX (6.96–509.50) (1.31–92.37)
Tumor location 10.32 <0.001 1.70 0.47
 Proximal versus distal (2.47-72.91) (0.41–8.80)
Tumor grade 1.11 0.86 4.11 0.08
 G3 versus G1/G2 (0.31–4.03) (0.84–24.97)
Histology 0.70 0.46 1.41 0.56
 UC versus non-UC (0.27–1.80) (0.44–4.89)
Gender 2.70 0.08 1.71 0.39
 Male versus female (0.89–9.16) (0.50–6.36)
Age 7.17 0.001 1.96 0.31
 ≥65 years versus <65 years (2.18-26.33) (0.52–7.48)
Prior history of malignoma 1.05 0.94 2.14 0.27
 Present versus absent (0.25–4.07) (0.55–9.03)

Bold values indicate statistically significant difference