Table 4.
Modified Poisson regression models for associations between one standard deviation change in continuous VLC-PUFA percentage and live birth
| Unadjusted RR (95% CI) 1-SD Change |
Adjusted RR (95% CI)b 1-SD Change |
|
|---|---|---|
| Total VLC PUFA (%) | 0.83 (0.65, 1.06) | 0.77 (0.58, 1.01) |
| Hydroxylated VLC PUFA (%) | 1.14 (1.08, 1.20) | 1.15 (1.04, 1.26) |
| PUFA Tertiles | ||
| Total VLC PUFA | Unadjusted RR (95% CI) |
Adjusted RR (95% CI) |
| Tertile 2 (1.310% - < 2.440%) vs. 1 (< 1.310%) | 1.35 (0.79, 2.32) | 1.12 (0.67, 1.85) |
| Tertile 3 (≥ 2.440%) vs. 1 (< 1.310%) | 0.68 (0.34, 1.34) | 0.55 (0.29, 1.07) |
| Hydroxylated VLC PUFA | ||
| Tertile 2 (0.139% - < 0.205%) vs. 1 (< 0.139%) | 1.06 (0.54, 2.06) | 1.10 (0.59, 2.07) |
| Tertile 3 (≥ 0.205%) vs. 1 (< 0.139%) | 1.67 (0.93, 3.00) | 1.72 (1.01, 2.94) |
a
Modeled as the probability of Live Birth = Yes
b
Adjusted for female age and treatment group