TABLE 2.
Summary of responses of each individual in terms of the skeletal muscle index, HGS, and physical performance tests after the first 12 weeks of active supplementation and the second 12 weeks of observation.
| SMI | HGS | Gait speed | 5TSTS | ||||||
| Number | Sex | 0–12 week | 12–24 week | 0–12 week | 12–24 week | 0–12 week | 12–24 week | 0–12 week | 12–24 week |
| 1 | F | RES | – | RES | – | RES | – | – | – |
| 2 | F | RES | – | RES | – | – | RES | RES | – |
| 3 | F | RES | – | RES | – | – | RES | RES | – |
| 4 | F | RES | RES | RES | – | – | RES | – | RES |
| 5 | F | RES | RES | – | – | RES | – | RES | – |
| 6 | F | RES | – | – | – | – | RES | RES | – |
| 7 | F | – | RES | RES | – | – | – | RES | – |
| 8 | M | RES | – | RES | – | – | RES | RES | RES |
| 9 | M | RES | – | – | – | RES | RES | RES | – |
| 10 | M | RES | RES | – | – | RES | – | RES | RES |
| 11 | M | RES | – | – | – | RES | – | RES | RES |
| 12 | M | RES | – | – | – | RES | – | RES | – |
| 13 | M | RES | RES | – | – | RES | – | – | – |
| 14 | M | RES | – | – | RES | RES | – | – | RES |
| 15 | M | RES | RES | – | – | – | – | – | RES |
| 16 | M | – | RES | RES | – | RES | – | – | RES |
| 17 | M | – | RES | – | – | RES | RES | RES | – |
| 18 | M | – | – | – | – | RES | – | RES | – |
| 19 | M | – | RES | – | – | RES | – | RES | – |
| 20 | M | – | – | – | – | RES | RES | – | RES |
| 21 | M | – | RES | – | – | – | RES | RES | – |
| 22 | M | – | – | – | – | – | RES | – | – |
| An error in the conversion from LaTeX to XML has occurred here. 2*Responder N (%) | 14 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 13 | 10 | 14 | 8 | |
| (63.6%) | (45.5%) | (31.8%) | (4.5%) | (59.1%) | (45.5%) | (63.6%) | (36.4%) | ||
| p-value | 0.113 | 0.001** | 0.183 | 0.035* | |||||
RES, responsive individual; SMI, skeletal muscle index; HGS, handgrip strength; 5TSTS, five times sit-to-stand test. Chi-square test for statistical analysis. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.