Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 10;29(6):680–690. doi: 10.1177/13524585231162262

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Assessment of co-localization between PRLs and SELs and identification of PRL+/SEL− and SEL+/PRL− phenotypes. (a) T1-weighted image. (b) T2-weighted image. (c) Filtered SWI-phase image. (d) T2-lesion mask at baseline. (e) Manual PRL annotation at week 72. (f) T2-associated PRL at week 72. (g) SELs detected based on interval from baseline to week 72. (h) Voxelwise overlap of T2-associated PRLs and SELs (red = PRL only, blue = SEL only, yellow = both). (i) Co-localized PRL+/SEL+ mask (dark red). (j) Co-localized SEL+/PRL+ mask (dark blue). (k) PRL+/SEL− lesions (light red). (l) SEL+/PRL− lesions (light blue). Note that lesion boundaries are slightly different in (i) and (j) due to differences in PRL and SEL detection methods.

PRL: paramagnetic rim lesion; SEL: slowly expanding lesion; SWI: susceptibility-weighted imaging; T2-assoc PRL: T2-lesion associated with a given paramagnetic rim.