Table 1.
Study | Sample Size |
Data | Best-Performing Model | Task | AUC | Comparisons |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Permuth, 2016 [53] | 38 | CT texture analysis + genomics | Logistic regression | Distinguish malignant from benign IPMNs | 0.92 | N/A |
Hanania, 2016 [54] | 53 | CT imaging (texture, shape, intensity) | Logistic regression | IPMN high- vs. low-grade dysplasia | 0.96 | Lower false positive rate than Fukuoka |
Chakraborty, 2018 [55] | 103 | CT imaging features | Random forest | High- vs. low-risk BD-IPMN | 0.77 | N/A |
Corral, 2019 [56] |
139 | MRI imaging features | CNN | Identify high-grade dysplasia or cancer in IPMNs | 0.78 | Accuracy was comparable to AGA/Fukuoka |
Chu, 2022 [57] |
214 | CT radiomics features | Random forest | Classify mucinous and non-mucinous cysts | 0.94 | Accuracy was comparable to radiologist |
Liang, 2022 [58] |
193 | CT + clinical data | Fused radiomics-DL | Differentiate MCN from IPMN | 0.973 | N/A |