Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 22;15(9):2410. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092410

Table 1.

Radiomic models for diagnosis and risk stratification of IPMNs.

Study Sample
Size
Data Best-Performing Model Task AUC Comparisons
Permuth, 2016 [53] 38 CT texture analysis + genomics Logistic regression Distinguish malignant from benign IPMNs 0.92 N/A
Hanania, 2016 [54] 53 CT imaging (texture, shape, intensity) Logistic regression IPMN high- vs. low-grade dysplasia 0.96 Lower false positive rate than Fukuoka
Chakraborty, 2018 [55] 103 CT imaging features Random forest High- vs. low-risk BD-IPMN 0.77 N/A
Corral,
2019 [56]
139 MRI imaging features CNN Identify high-grade dysplasia or cancer in IPMNs 0.78 Accuracy was comparable to AGA/Fukuoka
Chu,
2022 [57]
214 CT radiomics features Random forest Classify mucinous and non-mucinous cysts 0.94 Accuracy was comparable to radiologist
Liang,
2022 [58]
193 CT + clinical data Fused radiomics-DL Differentiate MCN from IPMN 0.973 N/A