Table 1.
Liking (1–5) | Familiarity (1–5) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fruit Wine type | Users (n = 89) |
Non- Users (n = 145) |
Significance | t | Overall Participants (n = 234) |
Users (n = 89) |
Non-Users (n = 145) |
Significance | t | Overall Participants (n = 234) |
Grape | 3.91 ± 0.83 | 3.47 ± 0.87 | *** | 3.83 | 3.64 ± 0.80 | 3.87 ± 0.88 | 3.35 ± 1.03 | *** | 4.05 | 3.55 ± 1.01 |
Blueberry | 3.93 ± 0.69 | 3.42 ± 0.85 | *** | 5.05 | 3.62 ± 0.83 | 3.25 ± 0.82 | 2.38 ± 0.96 | ** | 7.39 | 2.71 ± 1.00 |
Hawthorn | 3.60 ± 0.95 | 3.20 ± 0.95 | ** | 3.10 | 3.35 ± 0.97 | 3.11 ± 0.98 | 2.23 ± 0.95 | *** | 6.84 | 2.56 ± 1.05 |
Goji berry | 3.10 ± 1.00 | 2.84 ± 0.91 | * | 2.04 | 2.94 ± 0.95 | 3.09 ± 0.97 | 2.19 ± 0.97 | *** | 6.90 | 2.53 ± 1.07 |
Rosa roxburghii | 3.26 ± 0.89 | 2.88 ± 0.79 | *** | 3.43 | 3.02 ± 0.85 | 2.33 ± 0.90 | 1.81 ± 0.70 | *** | 4.58 | 2.01 ± 0.82 |
Apricot | 3.43 ± 0.78 | 2.97 ± 0.84 | *** | 4.20 | 3.14 ± 0.84 | 2.42 ± 0.90 | 1.88 ± 0.73 | *** | 4.76 | 2.08 ± 0.84 |
Users (total consumption frequency score of six fruit wines ≥ 10) and non-users (total consumption frequency score of six fruit wines < 10). Independent samples t-test was used to check the difference between users and non-users. ‘*’ represents p < 0.05, ‘**’ represents p < 0.01, and ‘***’ represents p < 0.001.