Table 3.
Comparison within Moments | Comparison between Groups | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A-B (Started with TT-FES) | B-A (Started with TT) | Effect for Moments | A-B | B-A | Effects for Groups | |||||
1 vs. 2 | 2 vs. 3 | 1 vs. 3 | 1 vs. 2 | 2 vs. 3 | 1 vs. 3 | Started with TT-FES | Started with TT | |||
FMA | p = 0.008 | - | p = 0.017 | p = 0.001 | - | p = 0.035 | = 0.27 | - | - | - |
BBS | p = 0.012 | - | p = 0.003 | - | - | p = 0.035 | = 0.30 | - | - | - |
LEMOCOT (non-paretic limb) |
p = 0.005 | - | p = 0.001 | - | - | p = 0.015 | = 0.39 | - | - | - |
LEMOCOT (paretic limb) | - | - | - | - | - | p = 0.026 | = 0.06 | ↓ | ↑ | = 0.23 |
10MWT | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ↑ | ↓ | = 0.16 |
TUG | p = 0.004 | - | p < 0.001 | - | - | - | = 0.35 | ↓ | ↑ | = 0.26 |
6MWT | p = 0.029 | - | p = 0.032 | - | - | p = 0.005 | F(2, 40) = 9.52, p = 0.001, = 0.32 | ↓ | ↑ | = 0.17 |
A-B Group, initial protocol treadmill training with stimulation followed by treadmill training without stimulation; B-A Group, initial protocol treadmill training without stimulation followed by treadmill training with stimulation; vs., versus; FMA, Fugl-Meyer Assessment; BBS, Berg Balance Scale; LEMOCOT, Lower Motor Coordination Test; 10 MWT, 10-Meter Walk Test; TUG, Time Up and Go Test; 6MWT, 6-Minute Walk Test; FES, Functional Electrical Stimulation; Moments, 1: baseline assessment, 2: assessment after 6 interventions; 3 assessment after 12 interventions and crossover; TT-FES, treadmill sequence of training with the use of FES; TT treadmill sequence of training without electrical stimulation.