Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 27;24(9):7962. doi: 10.3390/ijms24097962

Table 1.

Quality assessment of included studies.

No. Authors (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) Score References
1 Ress et al., 2003 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 6 [33]
2 Shen et al., 2005 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 7 [37]
3 Shen et al., 2005 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 6 [38]
4 Schöne et al., 2006 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 4 [39]
5 Chaves et al., 2008 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 6 [40]
6 Munakata et al., 2008 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 4 [41]
7 Nakamura et al., 2008 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 7 [42]
8 Suanarunsawat et al., 2009 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 8 [43]
9 Asnaashari et al., 2010 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 6 [44]
10 Khodambashi et al., 2012 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 [45]
11 Batubara et al., 2013 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 7 [46]
12 Caldas et al., 2013 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 7 [47]
13 Yamamoto et al., 2013 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 7 [34]
14 Batubara et al., 2015 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 6 [48]
15 Escobar et al., 2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 8 [49]
16 Khosravinia, 2015 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 [50]
17 Dahham et al., 2016 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 7 [51]
18 Firmin et al., 2016 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 5 [52]
19 Ogawa and Ito, 2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 9 [53]
20 Ogawa and Ito, 2016 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 [54]
21 Ogawa and Ito, 2016 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 8 [55]
22 Ornaghi et al., 2017 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 7 [56]
23 Walia et al., 2017 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 4 [57]
24 Zhang et al., 2017 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 8 [58]
25 Dehghani et al., 2018 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 6 [59]
26 Haque and Ansari, 2018 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 9 [60]
27 Ogawa et al., 2018 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 9 [61]
28 Chapman et al., 2019 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 7 [62]
29 Coelho-de-Souza et al., 2019 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 7 [63]
30 Mekonnen et al., 2019 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 8 [64]
31 Ogawa and Ito, 2019 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 9 [65]
32 Hong et al., 2020 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 8 [66]
33 Ogawa et al., 2020 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 9 [67]
34 Rossini et al., 2020 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 5 [68]
35 Yokoyama et al., 2020 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 8 [69]
36 Canche-Colli et al., 2021 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 7 [70]
37 Lu et al., 2021 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 7 [71]
38 Rafferty and Lamont, 2021 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 6 [72]
39 Torki et al., 2021 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 7 [73]
40 Zhang et al., 2021 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 6 [74]
41 Boaventura et al., 2022 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 7 [75]

Criteria of quality assessment: (1) description of the sampling procedure or compound manufacturer; (2) mention of essential oil compositions; (3) detailed description of interventions; (4) use of positive controls; (5) specific mention of strains/species of animals used; (6) mention of test subject age; (7) mention of test subject weight; (8) mention or explanation of underlying mechanisms; (9) statement of potential conflict of interests; and (10) peer-reviewed publication.