Table 4.
Frames of the food industry pre-regulation and post-regulation.
Pre-Regulation | Post-Regulation | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frame | N (315) |
% | N (422) |
% | z-Test |
Law enforcement | 10 | 3.2 | 15 | 3.6 | n.s. |
Cooperation with the law | 80 | 25.4 | 125 | 29.6 | n.s. |
Law as an economic threat | 132 | 41.9 | 55 | 13.0 | p < 0.001 |
Food labeling as a source of information | 4 | 1.3 | 7 | 1.7 | n.s. |
Solution to fight obesity | 1 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.7 | n.s. |
Incentive/pressure to adapt | 12 | 3.8 | 50 | 11.8 | p < 0.001 |
Law is confusing | 45 | 14.3 | 76 | 18.0 | n.s. |
Law is insufficient | 26 | 8.3 | 63 | 14.9 | p < 0.01 |
Law as an international benchmark | 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 0.2 | n.s. |
Industry does not look after children’s health | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 0.7 | n.s. |
The law protects consumers and children | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0.0 | n.s. |
The law as a step forward in public health policies | 1 | 0.3 | 1 | 0.2 | n.s. |
Nanny State | 2 | 0.6 | 0 | 0.0 | n.s. |
Lobby from the private sector | 1 | 0.3 | 0 | 0.0 | n.s. |
The law has an expropriatory character | 1 | 0.3 | 23 | 5.5 | p < 0.001 |