Skip to main content
. 2023 May 5;12(9):3299. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093299

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Binary random effects model: OdRa: 1.476 (0.684, 3.184), p-value: 0.321, tau^2: 0.692, Q (df = 13): 21.049, Het. p-value: 0.072, I^2: 38.239. Results (log scale) 0.389 (−0.380, 1.158) SE: 0.392; Weights: Jeong: 5.444%, Lain and Ajwani: 15.968%, Hasegawa: 16.599%, Hutcheson et al.: 7.585%, Migliorati: 4.414%, Mozzati 2013: 3.250%, O’Connell: 2.849%, Saia: 9.539%, Scoletta 2013: 4.480%, Scoletta 2011: 7.590%, Vescovi: 7.785%, Kang: 4.549%, Kawakita: 5.398%, Kunchur: 4.550%. Jeong et al., 2017 [36], Lain and Ajwani, 2016 [37], Hasegawa et al., 2017 [22], Hutcheson et al., 2014 [39], Migliorati et al., 2013 [42], Mozzati et al., 2013 [43], O’Connell et al., 2012 [46], Saia et al., 2010 [47], Scoletta et al., 2013 [48], Scoletta et al., 2011 [49], Vescovi et al., 2013 [50] Kang et al., 2020 [52], Kawakita et al., 2017 [53], Kunchur et al., 2009 [21].