Skip to main content
. 2023 May 7;12(9):3325. doi: 10.3390/jcm12093325

Table 3.

Summary of Results for Selected Studies Utilizing EUS-Guided RFA for PCN Therapy.

Author Study Year Number of Treated Patients Number of Treated Lesions Efficacy on Follow-Up Imaging **, n (%) Adverse Events, (n)
MCN IPMN Other * Incomplete Response Partial Response Complete Response
Pai et al. [11] 2015 6 4 1 1 0 (0) 4 (67) 2 (33) Mild abdominal pain (2)
Barthet et al. [66] 2019 17 1 16 0 5 (29) 1 (6) 11 (65) Jejunal perforation (1)
Oh et al. [68] 2021 13 0 0 13 5 (38) 8 (62) 0 (0) Mild abdominal pain (1)
Younis et al. [67] 2022 5 1 4 0 1 (20) 1 (20) 3 (60) Mild abdominal pain (2); Acute pancreatitis (1)

* The designation of “Other” includes patients treated in the above studies for cystic lesions that are non-neoplastic (i.e., pseudocysts), neoplastic without malignant potential (i.e., SCNs), or indeterminate based on pre-procedural analysis. Although the scope of this review focuses on the use of EUS-guided ablative procedures in the treatment of neoplastic cysts capable of malignant transformation (i.e., MCNs and IPMNs), this column is included in the table for the purpose of completeness. ** Complete response is defined as the radiographic absence of residual lesion on post-procedural imaging. Incomplete response is defined as either persistent or enlarged residual lesion on post-procedural imaging. If the study authors noted reduction in lesion size without resolution on post-procedural imaging, this is considered a partial response; if this was not recorded by the study authors, these lesions are categorized as incomplete response.