Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 18;2016(4):CD009747. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009747.pub2

Murray‐Kolb 2007.

Methods Design: randomised controlled trial
Randomisation: individual
Trial: daily oral iron versus placebo
Date of study: 1999 to 2002
Participants Setting: communities around University Park campus of The Pennsylvania State University in State College in the USA
Malaria endemicity: not stated
Included: women aged 18 years to 35 years (mean age 21 years)
Excluded: chronic illnesses or serious health problems, not speaking English as the primary language at home
Dropouts: 39 out of 152 (26% total loss to follow‐up)
Sample size: total: 113; intervention: 56, control: 57
Interventions Intervention: 160 mg ferrous sulphate containing 60 mg elemental iron
Control: placebo
Duration: 16 weeks
Outcomes Haemoglobin, iron status, anxiety and psychological scores
Notes Compliance: 95% (determine by pill count) not divided by iron/placebo group
Conflicts of interest: authors declare no conflict of interest
Funded by: USDA NRICGP 99‐35200‐7610 and GCRC MO1RR10732
Other notes: cognitive endpoint data reported in figures and without errors, not extractable
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Stratified randomisation performed by using random permuted blocks
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Bottles coded preventing disclosure of allocated arm
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Placebo administered
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Blinded as intervention and control could not be discerned; bottles coded
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 26% loss to follow‐up; 152 enrolled, 113 completed study
Selective reporting (reporting bias) High risk Endpoint data for several key cognitive outcomes not reported in study. Only shown on figures without SE/SD/CIs to enable extraction
Other bias Low risk The study appears free of other sources of bias