Table 1.
Critical Appraisal of Included Studies
| Studies | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 | Q9 | Q10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis et al, 200023 | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | U | Y |
| Walsh et al, 200021 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | U | Y |
| Lindberg et al, 200125 | U | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Scherman & Löwhagen, 200430 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Gamble et al, 200729 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Peláez et al, 201427 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | N | Y | Y | Y |
| George et al, 201532 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Peláez et al, 201624 | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | N | Y |
| Hedenrud et al, 201922 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Norful et al, 202028 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Ardura-Garcia et al, 202126 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
| Wadhahi et al, 202231 | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | Y | Y |
Notes: JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research: Q1= Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology? Q2= Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives? Q3= Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data? Q4= Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data? Q5= Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results? Q6= Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically? Q7= Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice- versa, addressed? Q8= Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented? Q9= Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body? Q10= Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?
Abbreviations: Y, yes; N, no; U, unclear; N/A, not applicable.