Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 26;12(4):797–807. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-23-167

Table 3. Comparison of characteristics before and after PSM between the two groups.

Feature Before PSM After PSM
Immunotherapy (n=16) Chemotherapy (n=32) P Immunotherapy (n=10) Chemotherapy (n=10) P
Gender, n (%) 0.131 1.000
   Male 10 (62.5) 12 (37.5) 5 (50.0) 4 (40.0)
   Female 6 (37.5) 20 (62.5) 5 (50.0) 6 (60.0)
Median age, years [range] 61 [35–77] 60.5 [44–75] 0.991 62 [35–77] 57.5 [47–70] 0.766
Smoking, n (%) 0.110 0.650
   Former/ever smoker 8 (60.0) 8 (22.6) 5 (50.0) 3 (30.0)
Mutation type, n (%) 0.005 1.000
   EGFR ex20ins 5 (31.2) 24 (75.0) 3 (30.0) 3 (30.0)
   HER2 ex20ins 11 (68.8) 8 (25.0) 7 (70.0) 7 (70.0)
PS score, n (%) 1.000 1.000
   0–1 15 (93.8) 31 (96.9) 10 (100.0) 10 (100.0)
   ≥2 1 (6.3) 1 (3.1) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
PD-L1 expression, n (%) 0.310 0.656
   ≥1% 6 (37.5) 7 (21.9) 4 (40.0) 6 (60.0)
   <1% or unevaluable 10 (62.5) 25 (78.1) 6 (60.0) 4 (40.0)
Brain metastasis, n (%) 6 (37.5) 10 (31.3) 0.750 3 (30.0) 4 (40.0) 1.000
Liver metastasis, n (%) 2 (12.5) 3 (9.4) 1.000 2 (20.0) 1 (10.0) 1.000

PSM, propensity score matching; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; PS, Performance Status; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1.