Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 10;2015(3):CD002229. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002229.pub4

Comparison 2. Hormone therapy versus placebo in secondary prevention.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Death (all‐causes) 7 5445 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.87, 1.24]
2 Death (cardiovascular causes) 6 5259 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.00 [0.78, 1.29]
3 Non‐fatal myocardial infarction 7 5359 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.81, 1.18]
4 Stroke 5 5172 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.09 [0.89, 1.33]
5 Angina 3 3155 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.91 [0.74, 1.12]
6 Venous thromboembolism 6 4399 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.02 [1.13, 3.62]
7 Pulmonary embolism 3 3920 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.48 [0.92, 6.70]
8 Revascularisation 3 3155 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.98 [0.63, 1.53]