WISDOM 2007.
Methods |
Objective: To assess the long‐term benefits and risks of HT Multicentre three‐armed randomised controlled (RCT) trial involving 499 general practices; (n = 385 UK); (n = 91 Australia) and (n = 24) New Zealand. The trial was conducted between 1999 ‐ 2002, with an intended follow‐up period of ten‐years. The trial was halted early after the publication of the results from WHI I 2002, which showed no statistically significant benefit for treatment with HT compared with placebo. The median follow‐up time was 11.9 months (interquartile range: 7.1 to 19.6) for the entire trial participants and 12.8 months (range: 7.5 to 20.4 ) months for participants randomised to combination therapy. The trial was composed of three different strata: Strata 1: Women with an intact uterus or sub‐total hysterectomy not taking HT randomised to combined oestrogen and progesterone therapy or placebo Strata 2: Hysterectomised women taking HT and randomised to oestrogen only HT or combined HT Stratum 3: Hysterectomised women not taking HT randomised to oestrogen only HT or combined HT or placebo The design therefore allowed for two main comparisons to be made: (1) combined oestrogen and progestogen therapy versus placebo, and in women who had a hysterectomy, (2) oestrogen alone versus combination oestrogen and progestogen therapy Only the baseline demographic data and results from strata 1 are reported within this report, as this was the only comparison of HT versus placebo within the trial Recruitment: Practice registries Screening: 14,203 screened for eligibility All women took placebo medication during run in: those who achieved 80% compliance were randomised Randomisation: Remote computer‐generated Stratification: By hysterectomy status and intended use of HT: women with no uterus and unwilling to take placebo randomised to CEE or combined HT. Equal probability of any treatment within each stratum Allocation: Remote computer‐generated Baseline equality of treatment groups: No substantive differences at baseline Blinding: All participants, clinic staff, and outcome assessors blinded except when vaginal bleeding triggered a code break Analysis: ITT Funding Source: Non‐commercial medical research funding |
|
Participants | 4385 healthy women in strata one (out of a total of 5692 women randomised) were randomised to either combined HT or placebo The mean age of the women was 63.3 years (SD: 4.7), with a mean of 14.7 years (SD: 7.1) since menopause. Post‐menopausal status was defined as the presence of no menses in the past 12 months or having undergone a hysterectomy. Women taking HT at baseline screening, who were prepared to enter the placebo controlled strata of the study, ceased therapy for three months before the run‐in phase. During run‐in they took placebo so that at randomisation they had not taken HT for six months At baseline, 9% of women were taking oestrogen, and therefore underwent a three‐month ‘wash out ‘period prior to randomisation. 2% of the included women were of non‐white ethnic status; 18% were using HT at screening and 86% had previously used HT. In terms of risk factors for CVD: mean BMI was 28.0 kg/m2; mean systolic blood pressure was 136.5 mm Hg and mean diastolic blood pressure 73 mm Hg; 24% were current smokers; 55% were former smokers; 10% had previous angina; 3% had a previous MI; 3% had a previous stroke and 7% had diabetes. Inclusion criteria: Stated above, but only women who were 80% or more medication compliant in the run‐in period were eligible for participation in the trial Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions |
HT regimen: 0.625 mg conjugated equine oestrogen in combination with 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) daily (continuous dosage regimen) Comparator: placebo tablet daily Participants were classified as medication compliant if they took ≥ 80% of their medication throughout the trial. Trial treatment delivered 73% of time to women in combined HT arm and 86% of time to women on placebo Follow‐up times: four, 14, 27, 40 and 52 weeks and then at six‐month intervals. At baseline recent cervical screening and mammography were checked and then at each follow‐up visit information was collected on all outcomes (none of the outcomes were defined), adverse events and patients other medical history Losses to follow‐up: five Dropouts: 615 (14%) had withdrawn from randomised treatment by trial closure |
|
Outcomes | Primary outcomes: Death from CVD Angina Non‐fatal MI Fatal MI Secondary outcomes: Pulmonary embolism Venous thromboembolism Health‐related quality of life |
|
Notes | Powered in protocol to detect 25% reduction in CHD over ten years. This assumed an 18,000 sample size but trial stopped early with 26% of target
A further 1307 women were in comparison of combined therapy vs oestrogen only and not included in this review. Events were not stratified according to time since menopause. However the mean time since menopause that treatment was started was reported for each group, 14.7 years (SD 7.1) for the control group and 14.8 years (SD 7.2) for the hormone group. For the subgroup analysis of when treatment was started, the entirety of events in this study were analysed as if all participants had started treatment more than 10 years after their menopause |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Remote computer‐generated |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Remote computer‐generated |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All participants and clinic staff blinded except when vaginal bleeding triggered a code break |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | All outcome assessors blinded except when vaginal bleeding triggered a code break |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | 615 (14%) had withdrawn from randomised treatment by trial closure. Analysed by ITT |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All expected outcomes reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No apparent source of other bias |