Table 5.
Item | Initial BW, g | Final BW, g | ADFI, g/hen | Egg production, egg/hen per day | Egg weight, g | Egg mass, g/day | FCR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experimental diet | |||||||
S10 | 1,738 | 1,921 | 108.7 | 0.94a | 57.75bc | 54.36 | 1.83 |
S20 | 1,748 | 1,976 | 115.2 | 0.92a | 59.55ab | 55.13 | 1.91 |
S30 | 1,739 | 1,995 | 116.9 | 0.92a | 58.77bc | 54.10 | 1.98 |
S45 | 1,727 | 1,876 | 111.2 | 0.84b | 61.15a | 51.64 | 1.99 |
P10 | 1,746 | 1,997 | 115.4 | 0.93a | 58.39bc | 54.44 | 1.94 |
P20 | 1,732 | 1.948 | 113.7 | 0.90ab | 57.30c | 51.55 | 2.02 |
P30 | 1,767 | 2.072 | 118.4 | 0.94a | 57.88bc | 54.63 | 1.99 |
P45 | 1,759 | 2.002 | 117.5 | 0.92a | 57.88bc | 54.38 | 2.01 |
Fat source | |||||||
Soybean | 1,738 | 1,942b | 113.0b | 0.90 | 59.31a | 53.81 | 1.93 |
Palm | 1,751 | 2,005a | 116.3a | 0.92 | 57.86b | 53.50 | 1.99 |
FFA content | |||||||
10% | 1,742 | 1,959 | 112.1 | 0.93a | 58.07b | 54.40 | 1.88 |
20% | 1,740 | 1,962 | 114.5 | 0.91ab | 58.42ab | 53.34 | 1.97 |
30% | 1,753 | 2,033 | 117.6 | 0.93a | 58.32ab | 54.36 | 1.98 |
45% | 1,743 | 1,939 | 114.4 | 0.88b | 59.52a | 52.51 | 2.00 |
SEM1 | 28.2 | 34.7 | 1.06 | 0.01 | 0.45 | 0.99 | 0.05 |
Effects, P-values | |||||||
Fat source | 0.439 | 0.011 | <0.001 | 0.146 | <0.001 | 0.703 | 0.111 |
FFA content | 0.106 | 0.081 | 0.062 | 0.003 | 0.027 | 0.286 | 0.095 |
Fat source × FFA | 0.312 | 0.160 | 0.084 | 0.009 | <0.001 | 0.110 | 0.622 |
Linear contrast2, P-values | |||||||
Overall | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Soybean | - | - | - | <0.001 | <0.001 | - | - |
Palm | - | - | - | 0.872 | 0.677 | - | - |
FFA = free fatty acids; S = soybean; P = palm; BW = body weight; ADFI = average daily feed intake; FCR = cumulative feed conversion ratio.
a-c Means within each variable with more than 2 levels (experimental diet or FFA content) not sharing a common superscript differ according to Tukey's test (P < 0.05).
Pooled standard error of the means.
Linear responses to dietary FFA content.