Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 28;13:313–323. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2023.03.002

Table 7.

Apparent total tract fatty acid digestibility (ATTD) coefficients according to different fat sources and dietary FFA content.

Item C16:0 C18:0 C18:1 n-9 C18:2 n-6 C18:3 n-3 SFA MUFA PUFA TFA
Experimental diet
 S10 0.81 0.86 0.88 0.91 0.94 0.82 0.89 0.91 0.88
 S20 0.81 0.83 0.90 0.93 0.96 0.81 0.90 0.93 0.90
 S30 0.78 0.80 0.87 0.90 0.92 0.77 0.87 0.90 0.87
 S45 0.79 0.78 0.90 0.95 0.94 0.78 0.90 0.95 0.91
 P10 0.73 0.65 0.91 0.91 0.91 0.73 0.91 0.91 0.83
 P20 0.73 0.66 0.91 0.90 0.90 0.72 0.91 0.90 0.84
 P30 0.70 0.63 0.90 0.88 0.89 0.70 0.90 0.88 0.81
 P45 0.69 0.64 0.90 0.89 0.90 0.69 0.90 0.89 0.81
Fat source
 Soybean 0.80b 0.82a 0.89b 0.92a 0.94a 0.79a 0.89b 0.92a 0.89a
 Palm 0.71a 0.64b 0.91a 0.89b 0.90b 0.71b 0.91a 0.90b 0.82b
FFA content
 10% 0.77 0.76a 0.90 0.91 0.92 0.77 0.90 0.91 0.86
 20% 0.77 0.74ab 0.91 0.92 0.93 0.77 0.90 0.92 0.87
 30% 0.74 0.72b 0.89 0.89 0.90 0.73 0.89 0.89 0.84
 45% 0.74 0.71c 0.90 0.92 0.92 0.73 0.90 0.92 0.86
SEM1 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01
Effects, P-values
 Fat source <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.002 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001 0.005 <0.001
 FFA content 0.064 0.033 0.059 0.109 0.230 0.057 0.061 0.163 0.091
 Fat source × FFA 0.883 0.334 0.068 0.087 0.637 0.887 0.070 0.092 0.167
Linear contrast2, P-values
 Overall - 0.004 - - - - - - -

S = soybean; P = palm; TFA = total fatty acids; SFA = saturated fatty acids; MUFA = monounsaturated fatty acids; PUFA = polyunsaturated fatty acids; FFA = free fatty acids.

a,b Means within each variable with more than 2 levels (experimental diet or FFA content) not sharing a common superscript differ according to Tukey's test (P < 0.05).

1

Pooled standard error of the means.

2

Linear responses to dietary FFA content.