Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 16;164(6):1181–1199. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002820

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the classical conditioning with verbal suggestion (pain) meta-analysis.

Author Year N Sample age Percent female Sensation induction method Placebo manipulation Rating scale Acquisition trials (Placebo/Control) Evocation trials (Placebo/Control) Calibrated stimulus intensity difference (0-100)* First or mean outcome measure Risk of bias score Comparison Outlier based on funnel plot
Au Yeung7 2014 20 19.8 59% Electrical Sham TENS 0-100 VAS 32 (16P/16C) 32 (16P/16C) NA First 3 W
Barnes11 2021 62 19.4 52% Electrical Sham TENS 0-10 pain intensity 30 (15P/15C) 20 (10P/10C) 45 Mean 3 W
Case21 2019 28 NR 53% Thermal Inert gel 0-80 pain intensity 8 (4P/4C) 16 (8P/8C) NA Mean 7 W
Choi23 2011 15 25.3 0% Electrical Sham IV 0-100 NRS Unknown 10 (5P/5C) NA Mean 3 W
Chouchou24 2015 26 23.4 46% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 16 (8P/8C) 10 (5P/5C) 35 Mean 4 W
Colagiuri27 2018 21 20.2 71% Electrical Sham TENS 0-100 VAS 32 (16P/16C) 32 (16P/16C) NA First 5 W
Colloca30 2006 10 22.7 83% Electrical Sham electrode 0-10 NRS 36 (18P/18C) 12 (6P/6C) NA Mean 5 W +
Colloca34 2008 15 22.5 100% Electrical Sham electrode 0-10 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 12 (6P/6C) NA Mean 3 W
Colloca35 2008a 16 32.0 66% Laser Inert gel 0-10 NRS 30 (15P/15C) 30 (15P/15C) NA Mean 5 W
Colloca31 2009 16 22.6 100% Electrical Sham electrode 0-10 NRS 24 (12P/12C) 12 (6P/6C) NA Mean 5 W
Colloca33 2010 46 22.8 65% Electrical Sham electrode 0-10 VAS 20 (10P/10C) 40 (20P/20C) 30 Mean 3 W +
Colloca33 2010 46 22.8 65% Electrical Sham electrode 0-10 VAS 80 (40P/40C) 40 (20P/20C) 30 Mean 3 W +
Colloca36 2019 53 28.1 64% Electrical Sham electrode 0-10 NRS 18 (9P/9C) 36 (18P/18C) 60 Mean 3 W
Colloca29 2020 400 29.4 59% Thermal Sham electrode 0-100 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 12 (6P/6C) NA Mean 5 W
Corsi37 2017 46 27.4 52% Thermal Sham electrode 0-100 VAS 12 (6P/6C) 6 (3P/3C) NA Mean 3 W
de Jong39 1996 36 21.3 100% Electrical Inert gel 0-100 VAS 20 (10P/10C) 10 (5P/5C) 25 Mean 5 B
De Pascalis40 2002 36 25.4 65% Electrical Inert gel 0-10 VAS 12 (6P/6C) 30 (15P/15C) NA Mean 2 W
De Pascalis43 2021 56 23.3 100% Cold cup Inert gel 0-100 NRS 2 (1P/1C) 2 (1P/1C) NA Mean 4 W
Egorova48 2020 24 NR 50% Thermal Inert gel 0-20 Gracely scale 48 (24P/24C) 24 (12P/12C) 25 Mean 5 W
Eippert49 2009 19 25.0 0% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 12 (6P/6C) 30 (15P/15C) 40 Mean 6 W
Eippert50 2009a 13 25.0 0% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 12 (6P/6C) 30 (15P/15C) 40 Mean 0 W
Feldhaus55 2021 624 24.6 60% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 16 (8P/8C) 16 (8P/8C) 40 Mean 3 W
Flaten57 2018 25 21.9 56% Thermal Inert pill 0-10 NRS 3 (2P/1C) 2 (1P/1C) NA Mean 0 W
Frangos58 2021 46 39.7 85% Thermal Inert gel 0-200 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 20 (10P/10C) 45 Mean 3 W
Freeman59 2015 24 NR 50% Thermal Inert gel 0-20 Gracely scale 18 (9P/9C) Unknown 25 Mean 5 W
Gaab60 2019 81 25.2 60% Thermal Inert gel 0-10 VAS 16 (8P/8C) 4 (2P/2C) 30 Mean 3 W
Geisler62 2020 33 27.4 0% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 16 (8P/8C) 8 (4P/4C) 40 Mean 3 W
Geuter63 2013 40 26.0 0% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 30 (15P/15C) 50 Mean 3 W
Geuter63 2013 40 26.0 0% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 30 (15P/15C) 30 Mean 3 W
Grahl66 2018 23 24.6 0% Thermal Sham TENS 0-100 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 24 (12P/12C) 40 Mean 0 W
Hartmann67 2021 45 23.8 51% Electrical Inert gel 0-8 pain intensity Unknown 32 (16P/16C) 30 Mean 1 W
Huneke74 2013 73 37.6 66% Laser Inert gel 0-10 NRS 20 (10P/10C) 20 (10P/10C) 40 Mean 3 B
Jarcho77 2016 15 24.3 100% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 2 (1P/1C) 2 (1P/1C) NA Mean 4 W
Kirsch79 2014 48 26.4 50% Thermal Sham acupuncture 0-20 Gracely scale Unknown Unknown 40 Mean 5 B
Klinger80 2007 12 26.1 50% Electrical Inert gel 0-8 pain intensity 10 (5P/5C) 10 (5P/5C) 25 Mean 8 W
Kong82 2006 16 28.4 44% Thermal Sham acupuncture 0-20 Gracely scale 48 (24P/24C) 24 (12P/12C) 40 Mean 5 W
Laverdure-Dupont85 2009 38 23.4 58% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 16 (8P/8C) 10 (5P/5C) 20 Mean 3 W
Lee86 2020 21 23.6 43% Pressure Inert gel 0-100 VAS 12 (6P/6C) 12 (6P/6C) NA Mean 5 W
Lui89 2010 31 23.5 58% Laser Sham electrode 0-100 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 12 (6P/6C) NA Mean 7 W
Martin95 2010 40 21.2 70% Thermal Inert gel 0-10 NRS 16 (8P/8C) 2 (1P/1C) 30 Mean 5 W
Martini96 2015 28 23.5 50% Laser Inert gel 0-100 NRS 24 (12P/12C) 32 (16P/16C) NA Mean 7 W
Martin-Pichora94 2011 15 22.8 68% Thermal Inert gel 0-10 NRS 16 (8P/8C) 2 (1P/1C) 30 Mean 3 W
Montgomery104 1997 24 NR 50% Electrical Inert gel 0-10 VAS 20 (10P/10C) 12 (6P/6C) 30 Mean 9 B
Morton106 2009 66 25.0 64% Laser Inert gel 0-10 pain intensity 60 (30P/30C) 60 (30P/30C) 40 Mean 5 B
Morton105 2010 56 25.0 62% Laser Inert gel 0-10 pain intensity 60 (30P/30C) 60 (30P/30C) 40 Mean 7 B
Power117 2020 57 49.0 65% Laser Inert gel 0-10 NRS 20 (10P/10C) 20 (10P/10C) 40 Mean 2 W
Price118 1999 34 19.3 60% Thermal Inert gel 0-10 VAS 30 (15P/15C) 4 (2P/2C) 40 Mean 6 W
Rhudy120 2018 33 36.4 51% Electrical Inert gel 0-100 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 24 (12P/12C) NA Mean 6 W +
Rosén124 2016 36 25.0 58% Thermal Sham electrode 0-100 NRS 3 (1P/2C) 3 (1P/2C) NA Mean 0 W
Rütgen126 2015 102 26.2 67% Electrical Inert pill 0-7 pain intensity 4 (2P/2C) Unknown 25 Unknown 3 B
Schafer127 2015 40 NR 67% Thermal Inert cream 0-100 VAS 16 (8P/8C) 40 (24P/16C) 40 Mean 6 W
Schafer127 2015 40 NR 67% Thermal Inert cream 0-100 VAS 112 (56P/56C) 40 (24P/16C) 40 Mean 6 W
Schenk129 2017 24 25.4 48% Thermal Sham TENS 0-100 VAS 18 (9P/9C) 18 (9P/9C) 40 Mean 3 W
Skvortsova131 2020 37 23.1 0% Thermal Inert nasal spray 0-10 NRS 24 (12P/12C) 20 (10P/10C) 30 Mean 0 W
Tang138 2019 30 22.5 67% Electrical Sham TENS 0-100 graphic rating scale 32 (16P/16C) 4 (2P/2C) NA Unknown 4 W
Tu139 2021 27 27.4 46% Thermal Inert cream 0-20 Gracely scale 48 (24P/24C) 24 (12P/12C) 25 Mean 3 W
Valentini141 2014 27 24.9 54% Laser Sham electrode 0-100 VAS 24 (12P/12C) 8 (4P/4C) 42 Mean 5 W
Vambheim142 2021 59 21.5 44% Thermal Inert gel 0-10 NRS 30 (15P/15C) 30 (15P/15C) NA Mean 0 W
Vambheim142 2021 32 NR 54% Electrical Inert gel 0-10 NRS 22 (11P/11C) 36 (18P/18C) 20 Mean 0 W
Wager152 2004 24 NR NR Thermal Inert gel 0-10 VAS 60 (12P/12C) 12 (6P/6C) 60 Mean 12 W
Wager149 2006 39 23.2 55% Laser Inert gel −2 to 10 VAS 10 (5P/5C) 80 (40P/40C) NA Mean 7 W
Wager150 2007 15 NR 0% Thermal Inert gel 0-10 VAS 10 (5P/5C) 60 (30P/30C) NA Mean 7 W
Watson154 2006 24 23.8 55% Laser Inert gel 0-100 NRS 20 (10P/10C) 20 (10P/10C) NA Mean 7 W
Watson156 2007 18 NR 45% Laser Inert gel 0-10 pain intensity 80 (40P/40C) 40 (20P/20C) 40 Mean 7 B
Watson155 2009 11 NR 54% Laser Inert gel 0-10 NRS 30 (15P/15C) 30 (15P/15C) 50 Mean 9 W
Wei157 2018 18 20.9 100% Electrical Sham electrode 0-10 pain intensity 40 (20P/20C) 16 (8P/8C) NA Mean 4 W
Weimer159 2019 78 27.5 73% Thermal Inert gel 0-10 VAS 16 (8P/8C) 16 (8P/8C) 30 Mean 2 W
Weng160 2021 32 22.0 75% Thermal Sham electrode 0-10 NRS 30 (15P/15C) 10 (5P/5C) 25 Mean 1 W
Wrobel162 2014 17 26.6 46% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 NRS 36 (18P/18C) 30 (15P/15C) 40 Mean 0 W
Wrobel161 2015 23 27.5 37% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 30 (15P/15C) 24 (12P/12C) 30 Mean 7 W
Zunhammer163 2018 33 25.0 50% Thermal Inert gel 0-100 VAS 30 (15P/15C) 30 (15P/15C) 40 Mean 1 W

For studies using a within-subject comparison to measure the placebo effect, N is reported as the number of participants from the group in which the comparison was made. For studies using a between-subject comparison, N is reported as the combined number of participants from the placebo and control groups from which the comparison was made, or only the placebo condition in the case of within subjects comparisons.

*

Instead of using calibrated stimulus intensities, some studies used fixed intensities, which were recorded here as NA. In the final column, “+” indicates a potential outlier with an effect size larger than the bounds of a 99% confidence interval, and “−” indicates a potential outlier with an effect size smaller than the bounds of a 99% confidence interval, based on inspection of funnel plots (Supplementary Materials, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/B752).

C, control; IV, intravenous; N, sample size; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; NRS, numeric rating scale; P, placebo; TENS, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation; VAS, visual analogue scale.