Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 16;164(6):1181–1199. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002820

Table 4.

Characteristics of studies included in the verbal suggestion (itch) meta-analysis.

Author Year N Sample age Percent female Sensation induction method Placebo manipulation Rating scale Risk of bias score Comparison
Bartels12 2014 48 22.7 77% Electrical Sham electrode 0-10 VAS 4 B
Darragh38 2015 48 22 78% Histamine Inert gel 0-10 itch intensity scale 1 W
Peerdeman112 2015 59 21.8 71% Histamine Inert pill 0-10 NRS 3 B
Skvortsova133 2018 54 22.1 100% Histamine Inert nasal spray 0-10 NRS 0 B
van Laarhoven145 2011 36 21.8 100% Histamine Inert gel* 0-10 VAS 1 B
Meeuwis99 2019 45 23.2 83% Histamine Inert gel 0-10 NRS 4 W
Meeuwis98 2021 28 21.3 81% Histamine Sham patch 0-10 NRS 4 W

For studies using a within-subject comparison to measure the placebo effect, N is reported as the number of participants from the group in which the comparison was made. For studies using a between-subject comparison, N is reported as the number of participants from the placebo and control groups from which the comparison was made, or only the placebo condition in the case of within-subject comparisons.

*

No actual inert gel was applied, instead the histamine gel was used and participants were led to believe an additional medical gel was added. No outliers based on inspection of funnel plots (Supplementary material, http://links.lww.com/PAIN/B752) were detected in this analysis.

N, sample size; NRS, numeric rating scale; VAS, visual analogue scale.