Skip to main content
. 2023 May 11;16:1559–1571. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S402354

Table 4.

Patient and Provider Views on Usability and Implementation of the Pain Profile

Patients (N=171) Qualitative Feedback
% of Patients Completing All Sections 70.2%





I don’t think the issue is really with the number of questions. It’s really about how to communicate this with the doctor, when I’m not always sure they have looked at the pre-visit surveys. – Patient














[I would like the option to review and possibly update] as needed when there is a significant change in pain, as well as prior to every visit – Patient
N (%)
Pain Profile Completion Time Perspectives
 Appropriate amount of time 133 (77.8)
 Too long 28 (16.4)
 Too short 7 (4.1)
 Missing 3 (1.7)
Pain Profile Modality Used
 Patient portal 68 (39.8)
 Paper form 41 (24.0)
 Not sure or missing 62 (36.2)
Preference for a Different Modality
 Yes 9 (5.3)
 No 87 (50.9)
 Not sure or missing 75 (43.8)
Preferred Frequency of Pain Profile Use
 Prior to every visit or every 6–12 months 111 (64.9)
 When provider asks 38 (22.2)
 Prior to first pain-related visit 12 (7.0)
 Other/missing 10 (5.9)
Mean (SD)
Ease of Accessing and Completing the Pain Profilea 4.0 (1.0)
Providers (N=32) Qualitative Feedback
Utilization of the Pain Profile: N (%)


[I would modify the way that patients receive and complete the Pain Profile by] provid[ing] the profile earlier as part of new patient visit assessment instead of randomly during treatment [and] another updated modified profile to help assess treatment goals and expectations met or unmet as part of treatment planning – Provider












They [patients] express a lot of frustration when this is filled out, then a new patient packet is filled out, and then the same questions are asked by a provider during the visit – Provider
 Refer to it before every appointment 6 (18.8)
 Refer to it somewhat regularly, but not before every appointment 10 (31.2)
 Review it once after it is complete, but not before subsequent meetings 7 (21.9)
 Never 3 (9.4)
 Missing 6 (18.7)
Platforms Used: N (%)
 My UofM Health Patient Portal 16 (50)
 Paper form 2 (6.2)
 Both 3 (9.4)
 Not sure/other/missing 11 (34.4)
Provider Perceptions of Barriers to Completion:b Mean (SD)
 Time-consuming (n=22) 3.3 (1.2)
 Confusing or complicated questions (n=22) 2.1 (0.9)
 Uncomfortable questions (n=22) 1.4 (0.6)
 Does not capture the right information (n=21) 1.9 (0.9)
Ease of Access (n=19) 2.5 (1.1)

Notes: aScale of 1–5 (1 = “not easy;” 5 = “difficult”). bProviders asked how often, if ever, do patients express the following concerns on a scale of 1–5 (1=“Never”, 2 =“Rarely”, 3= “Sometimes”, 4= “Quite often”, and 5= “Very often”).