Skip to main content
. 2023 May 15;18(5):e0285668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285668

Table 1. Carbon footprints of Teacher (ResNet18) and Student (MobileNetV2) model before KD (top two rows), traditional KD [26] and Ours approach on three different datasets.

↑ (↓) means higher (lower) is better.

CIFAR 10 CIFAR 10 Tiny ImageNet
Method Accuracy (%) ↑ Energy (kWh) ↓ CO2_eq (g) ↓ Accuracy (%) ↑ Energy (kWh) ↓ CO2_eq (g) ↓ Accuracy (%) ↑ Energy (kWh) ↓ CO2_eq (g) ↓
Teacher 95.04 0.28 74.25 76.03 0.25 65.55 63.39 1.43 413.60
Student 90.52 0.16 45.02 67.80 0.16 44.23 59.64 0.68 182.53
KD [26] 91.78 3.99 1173.44 69.70 3.80 1170.40 60.46 19.09 5595.31
Ours 91.67 0.21 61.76 69.40 0.20 61.60 60.53 1.02 304.88