Chart 2.
Authors (year) | Sample (n) | Study design | Objective | Analytical instrument | Intervention | Outcome |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bazazan et al.16 (2019) | 188 male office workers (operatives from a petrochemical control room) allocated to an intervention group (91) or a control group (97) | Randomized controlled clinical trial | To examine the effect of a posture correction-based intervention on musculoskeletal symptoms and fatigue | NMQ: musculoskeletal symptoms; MFI-20: Multidimensional Fatigue Questionnaire; RULA: to assess posture | Use of biofeedback to transmit communication via an audible and vibration alert to help workers to improve their posture when working | The low-cost device proved of considerable benefit for improving posture and reducing musculoskeletal symptoms and fatigue. |
Ailneni et al.20 (2019) | 19 workers: 10 women and 9 men | Quasi-experimental study | To evaluate the effect of a wearable posture sensor on posture and on physical demands on the head and neck during office work | Anthropometric measurements, reflective markers on several parts of the body, the floor, the chair, the table edge, and the laptop; infrared cameras: movement capture | Participants performed typing tasks with and without the sensor, sitting and standing up and were allowed to adjust their workstations during the experiment using a psychophysical method | The wearable sensor reduced postural stress on the neck. The effect was more significant when using the standing workstation compared to the sitting workstation. |
Yoo & Park21 (2013) | 12 workers (men) | Quasi-experimental study | To investigate the difference in kinematics of the neck and trunk segments as well as muscular activation between conditions with and without posture related auditory cueing | Surface electromyography: to measure the activity of the erector spine and upper trapezius; ultrasonic three-dimensional movement; CMSMS: to capture kinematic data, record angles of front and trunk during work, in the sagittal plane | A posture related auditory cueing (PAC) program, that played a cue consisting of a beep followed by a spoken postural correction suggestion at 300 second intervals | The auditory cueing program was positive for preventing unhealthy postures in the workplace and was recommended for practical use in the workplace. |
Levanon et al.17 (2012) | 66 workers (23 men and 43 women) allocated to a group with biofeedback (22) or a group without biofeedback (23) and control group without intervention (21) | Randomized controlled clinical trial | To test the efficacy of a workplace intervention for reducing musculoskeletal complaints among computer workers. | NMQ: to assess pain symptoms; RULA: to assess risk factors of posture and forced effort of arms, trunk, and legs; DCSQ: for psychosocial assessment of psychological demands, attitudes, and support in the workplace; SEMG: to report muscle activity | Three intervention programs: ergonomic intervention, including biofeedback and surface electromyography, intervention without biofeedback, and a control group | The interventions were effective for reducing workers’ musculoskeletal complaints and pain. The intervention with biofeedback had no unique contribution in comparison to other groups. |
CMSMS = ultrasonic movement analysis system; DCSQ = Swedish Demand Control and Support Questionnaire; SEMG = surface electromyography; MFI-20 = Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory; NMQ = Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire; RULA = Rapid Upper Limb Assessment.