Table 28.
Country | Variable | Tie‐stall | Cubicle | Straw yard | Compost‐bedded pack | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bacteriological findings (BACT) | ||||||
CH | BACT: environm. pathogens IMI (a) | ns | ns | Bludau et al. (2016) | ||
FI | BACT: CNS, S. uberis, S. dysgal., C. bovis | ns | ns | Taponen et al. (2017) | ||
BACT: E. coli | ↓ | ↑ (with parlour) | ||||
SE | BACT: other pathogens | ns | ns | Duse et al. (2021) | ||
BACT: T. pyogenes | ↓ | ↑ | ||||
DE, DK | BACT: quarter bact. pos. & SCC > 100 | ↓ | ↑ | Ivemeyer et al. (2018) | ||
Clinical mastitis (CM) | ||||||
IT | CM: medical dry‐off | ↑ | ↓ | Zanon et al. (2021) | ||
NO | CM: mastitis treatments | ns | ns | Simensen et al. (2010) | ||
SE | CM: acute | ns | ns | Nielsen and Emanuelson (2013) | ||
AT | CM: acute or chronic | ns | ns | Firth et al. (2019) | ||
AT | CM: CM /cow & year | ns | ns | Schenkenfelder and Winckler (2021) | ||
CAN | CM: CM/100 cow‐years at risk | ns | ns | Levison et al. (2016) | ||
USA | CM: CM/305‐cow‐days | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | Richert et al. (2013) | |
USA | CM: CM/week | ns | ns | Eckelkamp et al. (2016a) | ||
ES | CM: CM in 150DIM | ↑ | ↓ | Astiz et al. (2014) | ||
USA | CM: CM (b) | ↓ | ↑ | Sjostrom et al. (2019) | ||
Somatic cell count (SCC) | ||||||
FI | SCC: CSCC | ns | ns | Hiitio et al. (2017) | ||
SCC: SCC ≥ 200 in ≥ 1 of 4 test days | ↓ | ↑ | ||||
SCC: SCC ≥ 200 in ≥ 3 of 4 test days | ↓ | ↑ | ||||
NO | SCC: gBMSCC | ns | ns | Simensen et al. (2010) | ||
SE | SCC: Score BMSCC (c) | ns | ns (with parlour) | Nielsen and Emanuelson (2013) | ||
SE | SCC: LL; HL; HH herds (d) | ( ↓ ) | ( ↑ ) | Persson Waller et al. (2021) | ||
USA | SCC: SCS (e) | ↓ | ↑ | Dechow et al. (2011) | ||
CA | SCC: gBMSCC | ↑ | ↓ | Bauman et al. (2018) | ||
BE | SCC: SCS (f) | ↑ | ↓ | ↑ | Detilleux et al. (2012) | |
DE, DK | SCC: SCS | ↓ (deep‐bedded) | ↑ | Ivemeyer et al. (2018) | ||
SCC: cure during lactation | ↓ | ↑ | ||||
AT, DE, IT, NL, SI, SE | SCC: log10SCC | ↓ | ↑ | Emanuelson et al. (2022) | ||
SCC: high SCC (g) | ↓ | ↑ | ||||
SCC: new high SCC (g) | ↓ | ↑ | ||||
IT | SCC: CSCC | ↑ | ↓ | Biasato et al. (2019) | ||
USA | SCC: BMSCC | ns | ns | Eckelkamp et al. (2016a) | ||
SCC: SCC ≥ 200 | ns | ns | ||||
ES | SCC: mean lactation SCC | ( ↑ ) | ( ↓ ) | Astiz et al. (2014) | ||
USA | SCC: SCS (b) | ns | ns | Heins et al. (2019) | ||
USA | SCC: BMSCC | ( ↓ ) | ( ↓ ) | ↑ | ( ↓ ) | Eckelkamp et al. (2016a) |
↓ = significantly less mastitis (p < 0.05), (↓) = a tendency for less mastitis (p < 0.1), ↑ = significantly more mastitis (p < 0.05); (↑) = a tendency for more mastitis (p < 0.1); ns = not significant. The housing systems compared are indicated by these arrows and empty cells mean that the corresponding housing system was not included in the comparison.
Primiparous cows, early lactation.
Straw yard outside, compost bedded pack inside.
Score BMSCC: very high, high, medium, low, very low.
CSCC in first two test days: LL = low‐low = primiparous cows with SCC ≤ 75 at first and second milk recording (≤ 75 ≤ 75).
Lower SCS in tie‐stall confined and tie‐stall outdoor + component feed vs. both cubicle systems and to tie‐stall with outdoor + TMR.
Tie‐stall and straw yard group together as one group.
High SCC: > 150 in primiparous cows, > 200 in multiparous cows, HH = high‐high = SCC > 100 at both test days (> 100 > 100); HL = high‐low = SCC > 100 ≤ 75. – > % LL, HL, HH cows/herd & year. – > herds above Q2 in year 1 and above Q3 in year 2 and 3 classified as LL, HH, HL herds.