Skip to main content
. 2023 May 16;21(5):e07993. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7993

Table 43.

Hazards associated with the occurrence of self‐grooming

Hazards Variable Analysis (a) Effect Reference
Solid rubber floor vs. mastic asphalt vs. slatted concrete Self‐licking on three or four legs (events/3 h) UA ns Haufe et al. (2009)
Concrete floor (vs. rubber floor) Self‐licking while standing on 3 legs (events/8 h) UA Platz et al. (2008)
Caudal self‐licking (events/8 h) UA
Increased stocking density in transition pen Self‐licking (min/h), immediately after integration into lactating herd MA Mazer et al. (2020)

↑/↓ = significantly higher/lower (p < 0.05); (↑)/(↓) = by tendency higher/lower (p < 0.1); ns = not significant. The colour of the sign (red or green) indicates whether the effect is considered positive from an animal welfare perspective (green) or negative (red).

(a)

UA = univariable, MA = multivariable.