Table D.2.

Lameness prevalence or mean locomotion scores reported for cubicle systems

Country	n (a)	ø Herd size (range)	Scale	Level	Variable	Measure	Prevalence	Reference
DE	na	na	0–2	Cow	% score ≥ 1		26	Sjöström et al. (2018)
ES	na	na	0–2	Cow	% score ≥ 1		9	Sjöström et al. (2018)
FR	na	na	0–2	Cow	% score ≥ 1		26	Sjöström et al. (2018)
SI	na	na	0–2	Cow	% score ≥ 1		7	Sjöström et al. (2018)
ES	1	na	0–2	Herd	% score 1	LSmean	15.4	Fernández et al. (2020)
					% score 2	LSmean	0.7
FR	76	51.2 [± 1.51]	0–2	Herd	% score 1	Median (1st–3rd quartiles)	9.2 [3.4–17.1]	De Boyer des Roches et al. (2014)
					% score 2		0.0 [0.0–3.6)
DE	64	374 (47–1,609)	0–2	Herd	% score 2	Mean ± SD	15.7 ± 10.2	Gieseke et al. (2020)
Algeria	5	Small‐scale	1–3	Herd	% score ≥ 2	Mean	6.1	Dendani‐Chadi et al. (2020)
PL	na	na	1–3	Cow	% score ≥ 2		44.0	Olechnowic z et al. (2010)
UK	169	na	0–3	Herd	% score ≥ 2	Mean	38.8	Barker et al. (2010)
NL	179	(22–211)	1–5	Herd	% score > 2	Mean (range)	32.3 (0–97.7)	de Vries et al. (2015)
FI	87	49 (40–105)	1–5	Herd	% score > 2	Median (range)	21.0 (2.0–62.0)	Sarjokari et al. (2013)
AT	5	30 (20–39)	1–5	Herd	% score ≥ 2	Mean ± SD	14.9 ± 13.4	Burgstaller et al. (2016)
USA	40	na	1–5	Herd	% score ≥ 3	Mean	55.0	Chapinal et al. (2013)
	39	na					31.0
USA	66	851 (203–2966)	1–5	Herd	% score ≥ 3	Mean ± SD	13.2 ± 7.3	Cook et al. (2016)
					% score ≥ 4	Mean ± SD	2.5 ± 2.7
CAN, USA	36	125	1–5	Herd	% score ≥ 4	Mean (range)	15 (2.5–46)	Westin et al. (2016)
					% score 5	Mean	4
USA	7	na	1–5	Herd	Mean score	LSmean	2.27	Eckelkamp et al. (2016)
Türkiye	22	na	0–4	Cow	Mean score		1.53	Kara et al. (2011)

^(a)Number of farms, na – data not available, LSmean – least squares mean.