Skip to main content
. 2023 May 16;21(5):e07993. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7993

Table I.10.

Association between milk yield and mastitis; + = positive association: significantly more mastitis in herds with more milk yield (p < 0.05), − = negative association: significantly more mastitis in herds with lower milk yield (p < 0.05), ns = not significant

Country System n 1 ø Milk yield Variable Analysis 2 Association Reference
FI Tie‐stall, cubicles 4,173 Median, 2nd parity: 8,900 kg/cow & year BACT: C. bovis IMI incidence MA ns Taponen et al. (2017)
BACT: CNS IMI incidence MA +
BACT: E. coli IMI incidence MA +
BACT: S. aur. IMI incidence MA +
BACT: Strep. dysgal. IMI incidence MA +
BACT: Strep. uberis IMI incidence MA +
AT Tie‐stall, loose housing 1,221 Median: 5,617 kg/cow & year CM: CM per cow & year MA + Schenkenfelder and Winckler (2021)
CAN Cubicle, straw yard, tie‐stall 59 26.8; 31.2 kg/cow & days 3 CM: CM/100 cow years at risk MA ns Levison et al. (2016)
CAN Tie‐stall, loose housing 11,636 701,000 kg/herd SCC: gBMSCC UA ns Bauman et al. (2018)
FI tie‐stall, Cubicles 7,640 Only give in categories SCC: SCC MA + Hiitio et al. (2017)
CH Loose housing 47 21.0 kg/days SCC: SCS (1 year) MA Ivemeyer et al. (2011)
1

Number of farms.

2

Statistical analysis: MA = multivariable analysis (in the case of univariable pre‐selection of factors only effects of the final models were considered), UA = univariable analysis.

3

Loose housing; tie stalls.