Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 1;32(6):e4646. doi: 10.1002/pro.4646

TABLE 2.

Profile HMM trained on diNAcBac cluster can distinguish UDP‐diNAcBac specific PGTs.

HMM scoring
E‐value Score PGT Organism Uniprot ID Substrate
7.20E‐75 246.2 PglC C. jejuni Q0P9D0 UDP‐diNAcBac
2.00E‐75 248.2 PglC H. pullorum E1B268 UDP‐diNAcBac
8.70E‐74 242.7 WeeH A. baumannii B0V6J8 UDP‐diNAcBac
8.50E‐73 239.5 PglB N. gonorrhoeae Q5FAE1 UDP‐diNAcBac
1.00E‐73 242.5 EpsL B. subtilis P71062 UDP‐diNAcBac
8.00E‐51 169.6 WecP A. hydrophila B3FN88 UDP‐GalNAc
2.60E‐48 161.4 PglB C. botulinum C5UXG8 Unknown
2.70E‐41 138.6 Unnamed F. nucleatum Q8R6F8 UDP‐QuiNAc
1.00E‐51 172.5 WcaJ E. coli P71241 UDP‐Glc
1.60E‐54 181.7 WbaP S. enterica P26406 UDP‐Gal
3.90E‐56 186.8 Cap5M S. aureus P95706 UDP‐FucNAc