Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 1;47(3):563–593. doi: 10.1177/0193841X221116721

Table 3.

Eligible Within-Study Comparisons of Development Programs.

Study Intervention Country Outcome(s) Benchmark NRS replication WSC type
Buddelmeyer and Skoufias (2004) Cash transfer (PROGRESA) Mexico Reported school attendance and child labor Cluster-RCT RDD Tiebreaker/synthetic
Diaz and Handa (2006) Cash transfer (PROGRESA) Mexico Reported food expenditure, school enrollment, child labor Cluster-RCT Cross-section regression, matching Simultaneous
Handa and Maluccio (2010) Cash transfer (RPS) Nicaragua Reported expenditure, childcare, preventive health care, child illness Cluster-RCT Matching Simultaneous
McKenzie et al. (2010) Immigration entitlement Tonga Reported income RCT Cross-section regression, panel data regression (DD), IV regression, matching Simultaneous
Galiani and McEwan (2013) Cash transfer (PRAF) Honduras Census reported school enrollment and child labor Cluster-RCT RDD Tiebreaker
Barrera-Osorio et al. (2014) Scholarship Cambodia Grade completion and math test score Cluster-RCT RDD Tiebreaker/synthetic
Chaplin et al. (2017) Subsidy Tanzania Reported energy use and cost Cluster-RCT Matching Simultaneous
Galiani et al. (2017) Cash transfer (PRAF) Honduras Census reported school enrollment and child labor Cluster-RCT GDD Tiebreaker

Note. PROGRESA = Programa de Educación, Salud y Alimentación; RPS = Red de Protección Social; RCT = ; RDD = regression discontinuity design; DD = double-differences; GDD = geographical discontinuity design; PRAF = Programa de Asignación Familiar.